G. Thomas Munsterman

404 total citations
13 papers, 203 citations indexed

About

G. Thomas Munsterman is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Thomas Munsterman has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 203 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Law, 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in G. Thomas Munsterman's work include Jury Decision Making Processes (13 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (8 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (4 papers). G. Thomas Munsterman is often cited by papers focused on Jury Decision Making Processes (13 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (8 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (4 papers). G. Thomas Munsterman collaborates with scholars based in United States. G. Thomas Munsterman's co-authors include Valerie P. Hans, Martin T. Wells, Theodore Eisenberg, Stewart J. Schwab, Michael Heise, Nancy J. King and Stephen P. Garvey and has published in prestigious journals such as Political Science Quarterly, Journal of Quality Technology and Law and Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

G. Thomas Munsterman

12 papers receiving 164 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Thomas Munsterman United States 8 153 105 33 19 14 13 203
Oren Gazal‐Ayal Israel 7 98 0.6× 98 0.9× 101 3.1× 51 2.7× 19 1.4× 28 228
Monroe H. Freedman United States 7 93 0.6× 35 0.3× 31 0.9× 32 1.7× 13 0.9× 44 146
Benjamin C. Zipursky United States 8 105 0.7× 90 0.9× 24 0.7× 40 2.1× 5 0.4× 58 197
J. A. Jolowicz Canada 5 57 0.4× 46 0.4× 54 1.6× 53 2.8× 4 0.3× 23 163
A. P. Simester United Kingdom 9 66 0.4× 23 0.2× 92 2.8× 58 3.1× 4 0.3× 34 201
Barry Cushman United States 6 70 0.5× 57 0.5× 58 1.8× 61 3.2× 9 0.6× 27 160
Eskridge United States 8 147 1.0× 102 1.0× 71 2.2× 84 4.4× 30 2.1× 40 251
Stefan Machura United Kingdom 9 102 0.7× 12 0.1× 76 2.3× 56 2.9× 11 0.8× 51 198
Jonathan Crowe Australia 6 47 0.3× 11 0.1× 47 1.4× 39 2.1× 4 0.3× 70 129
Edwin W. Tucker United States 3 35 0.2× 22 0.2× 66 2.0× 95 5.0× 8 0.6× 13 210

Countries citing papers authored by G. Thomas Munsterman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Thomas Munsterman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Thomas Munsterman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Thomas Munsterman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Thomas Munsterman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Thomas Munsterman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Thomas Munsterman. The network helps show where G. Thomas Munsterman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Thomas Munsterman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Thomas Munsterman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Thomas Munsterman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Thomas Munsterman. G. Thomas Munsterman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Eisenberg, Theodore, et al.. (2006). Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: Empirical Analyses Using the Civil Justice Survey of State Courts 1992, 1996, and 2001 Data. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 3(2). 263–295. 28 indexed citations
2.
3.
Eisenberg, Theodore, et al.. (2005). Judge‐Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven and Zeisel's The American Jury. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 2(1). 171–207. 55 indexed citations
4.
Eisenberg, Theodore, et al.. (2004). Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven & Zeisel's The American Jury. SSRN Electronic Journal. 20 indexed citations
5.
Garvey, Stephen P., et al.. (2004). Juror First Votes in Criminal Trials. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 1(2). 371–398. 4 indexed citations
6.
Hans, Valerie P., et al.. (2000). Permitting jury discussions during trial: Impact of the Arizona Reform.. Law and Human Behavior. 24(3). 359–382. 17 indexed citations
7.
Hans, Valerie P., et al.. (2000). The Timing of Opinion Formation by Jurors in Civil Cases: An Empirical Examination. eYLS (Yale Law School). 7 indexed citations
8.
Hans, Valerie P., et al.. (1999). The Arizona Jury Reform Permitting Civil Jury Trial Discussions: The View of Trial Participants, Judges, and Jurors. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. 32(2). 349–377. 10 indexed citations
9.
Hans, Valerie P., et al.. (1999). How Much Justice Hangs in the Balance? A New Look at Hung Jury Rates. eYLS (Yale Law School). 2 indexed citations
10.
Munsterman, G. Thomas, et al.. (1997). Jury trial innovations. 18 indexed citations
11.
Munsterman, G. Thomas & Nancy J. King. (1996). Stratified Juror Selection: Cross-Section by Design. 79. 273. 3 indexed citations
12.
Munsterman, G. Thomas. (1995). We the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy, by Jeffrey Abramson. Political Science Quarterly. 110(2). 339–339. 29 indexed citations
13.
Munsterman, G. Thomas, et al.. (1974). A Standard of Juror Usage. Journal of Quality Technology. 6(2). 107–112.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026