G. Sponer

61 papers receiving 936 citations

Peers

G. Sponer
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 490
  • Internal Medicine 69
  • Hematology 94
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 43
  • Cancer Research 112
Replace Joseph L. Romson with:
Joseph L. Romson United States
T D Bjornsson United States
C. Bossaller Germany
H. Neubauer Germany
Thomas Hohlfeld Germany
W. Rafflenbeul Germany
P Fitscha Austria
Giulio A. Cinotti Italy
Yuji Miyao Japan
Laine J. Murphey United States
G. Sponer relative to Joseph L. Romson United States Joseph L. Romson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Joseph L. Romson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Sponer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Sponer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Sponer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Sponer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Sponer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Sponer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Sponer. The network helps show where G. Sponer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Sponer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Sponer Line = papers co-authored together G. Sponer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198098
2 198794
3 199074
4 200358
5 199246
6 197644
7 198743
8 198740
9 200438
10 199631
11 199229
12 199328
13 199125
14 199124
15 199320
16
Cardiac action of carazolol and methypranol in comparison with other beta-receptor blockers.
197720
17
Inhibitory effects of the selective thromboxane receptor antagonist BM 13.177 on platelet aggregation, vasoconstriction and sudden death.
198418
18 198517
19 199216
20 199215

About G. Sponer

G. Sponer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cancer Research, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (12 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (10 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (8 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (7 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (7 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (490 citations), Internal Medicine (69 citations), Hematology (94 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (43 citations) and Cancer Research (112 citations). G. Sponer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include K. Strein, W. Bartsch, B. Müller‐Beckmann, Ulrich Martin, P. Schelling, Detlev Ganten, Ursula Ganten, Η Böhm, Stephan Fischer and T Unger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis and Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact