G. Schott

860 citations
33 papers · 563 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

G. Schott

31 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

G. Schott
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Urology 136
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 236
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 127
  • Oncology 158
  • Hepatology 36
Replace P.J.C. Brooman with:
P.J.C. Brooman United Kingdom
Julien Branchereau France
Harry Winkler Israel
R. E. Williams United Kingdom
Philipp Gild Germany
Gustavo Caserta Lemos Brazil
J.J. Zudaire Spain
Michael Poch United States
Osamu Kamihira Japan
S.K. Sundaram United Kingdom
G. Schott relative to P.J.C. Brooman United Kingdom P.J.C. Brooman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
P.J.C. Brooman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Schott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Schott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Schott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Schott. The network helps show where G. Schott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Schott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Schott Line = papers co-authored together G. Schott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998116
2 199183
3 200564
4 200938
5 201235
6 200728
7 199524
8
Congenital juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the testis in newborns.
201020
9 200719
10
[The significance of tumor diameter in renal cell carcinoma].
199217
11 199916
12 201015
13 19889
14 20099
15 20079
16
Clinical and surgical experience with Wilms' tumor. Long-term results of a single institution.
20109
17 19958
18 19897
19 20076
20 20005

About G. Schott

G. Schott is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Urology, Rheumatology and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (10 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (8 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers), Renal and related cancers (3 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (3 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (3 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (136 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (236 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (127 citations), Oncology (158 citations) and Hepatology (36 citations). G. Schott has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Vahudin Zugor, Apostolos P. Labanaris, K. M. Schrott, A. Sigel, W Roesch, Anne‐Karoline Ebert, Reinhard Kühn, A. Ebert, Wolfgang Rösch and Hans‐Joachim Schmoll. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Urology, The Journal of Urology, European Journal of Cancer, Journal of Pediatric Surgery and Annals of Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact