G. Schäfer

566 citations
8 papers · 37 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Classical and Quantum Gravity (1 paper)Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General (3 papers)Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento (1 paper)IRE International Convention Record (1 paper)Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (2 papers)
Partner nations
GermanyUnited States

In The Last Decade

G. Schäfer

8 papers receiving 37 citations

Peers

G. Schäfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 9
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 34
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 16
  • Geophysics 6
  • Oceanography 5
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 12
Replace G. Liu with:
G. Liu United States
K. H. Cook United States
J. Dick United Kingdom
T. Demma Italy
V. Plyaskin Russia
H. Dittus Germany
Ken-ichi Oohara Japan
Dana Simard Canada
P. Rosenzweig Venezuela
Oleg Markin Russia
G. Schäfer relative to G. Liu United States G. Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
G. Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Schäfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Schäfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Schäfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Schäfer. The network helps show where G. Schäfer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside G. Schäfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Schäfer Line = papers co-authored together G. Schäfer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 198312
2 19808
3 19815
4 19834
5 19814
6 19812
7 20051
8 19841

About G. Schäfer

G. Schäfer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geophysics and Oceanography, having authored 8 papers that have together received 37 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (2 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (2 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (1 paper), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (1 paper), Precipitation Measurement and Analysis (1 paper) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (34 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (16 citations), Geophysics (6 citations), Oceanography (5 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (12 citations). G. Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. Dehnen, P. Rice and K. Norton. Their work appears in journals such as Classical and Quantum Gravity, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General, Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento, IRE International Convention Record and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact