G. Rekha
- Co-authors
- R. M. SundaramM. AnilaK. PranathiG. HarikaC. H. BalachiranjeeviG. S. LahaYugander ArraB. C. Viraktamath
- Topics
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (5 papers)Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (5 papers)Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEAntibiotics
- Partner nations
- India
In The Last Decade
G. Rekha
10 papers receiving 74 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Plant Science 68
- Molecular Biology 20
- Cell Biology 8
- Genetics 5
- Biotechnology 3
Countries citing papers authored by G. Rekha
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Rekha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Rekha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Rekha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Rekha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Rekha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Rekha. The network helps show where G. Rekha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Rekha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Rekha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Rekha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Rekha. G. Rekha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | Identification of novel sources of resistance against bacterial blight disease through intensive screening of wild rice introgression lines | 0 |
| 11 | Screening of breeding lines of Improved Samba Mahsuri possessing Saltol QTL for seedling stage salinity tolerance | 2 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | A single-tube, functional marker-based multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of major bacterial blight resistance genes in rice, Xa21, xa13 and xa5 | 2 |
| 16 | Marker-assisted introgression of genes conferring resistance against bacterial blight & blast into RPHR-1005, the elite restorer line of the popular rice hybrid, DRRH-3 | 0 |
About G. Rekha
G. Rekha is a scholar working on Plant Science, Health Information Management and Cell Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 75 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (5 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (5 papers) and Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (68 citations), Cell Biology (8 citations) and Biotechnology (3 citations). G. Rekha has collaborated with scholars based in India. Frequent co-authors include R. M. Sundaram, M. Anila, K. Pranathi, G. Harika, C. H. Balachiranjeevi, G. S. Laha, Yugander Arra, B. C. Viraktamath, Kalyani M. Barbadikar and S. M. Balachandran. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Antibiotics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.