G. Phillips

480 total citations
30 papers, 235 citations indexed

About

G. Phillips is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Phillips has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 235 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 23 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 19 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in G. Phillips's work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (22 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (22 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (18 papers). G. Phillips is often cited by papers focused on Superconducting Materials and Applications (22 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (22 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (18 papers). G. Phillips collaborates with scholars based in France, Japan and Spain. G. Phillips's co-authors include Valerio Tomarchio, Matthew J. Smith, P. Barabaschi, A. Cucchiaro, P. Decool, S. Davis, K. Yoshida, L. Zani, L. Reccia and S. Cuneo and has published in prestigious journals such as Geophysical Prospecting, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity and Fusion Engineering and Design.

In The Last Decade

G. Phillips

25 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Phillips France 10 161 135 120 60 36 30 235
V. Kukhtin Russia 9 136 0.8× 180 1.3× 103 0.9× 57 0.9× 24 0.7× 50 253
Yuzhou Mao China 11 89 0.6× 287 2.1× 188 1.6× 59 1.0× 54 1.5× 37 302
R. Mumgaard United States 13 107 0.7× 274 2.0× 99 0.8× 126 2.1× 37 1.0× 39 325
T. Shimozuma Japan 7 47 0.3× 163 1.2× 103 0.9× 70 1.2× 70 1.9× 18 235
V. M. Leonov Russia 9 89 0.6× 270 2.0× 93 0.8× 167 2.8× 28 0.8× 31 321
L. Delpech France 8 68 0.4× 159 1.2× 113 0.9× 34 0.6× 38 1.1× 39 200
E. Daly United States 7 100 0.6× 105 0.8× 105 0.9× 35 0.6× 40 1.1× 20 169
Kuang Guang-li China 8 99 0.6× 174 1.3× 70 0.6× 55 0.9× 18 0.5× 47 216
N. Mizuguchi Japan 7 45 0.3× 147 1.1× 40 0.3× 57 0.9× 19 0.5× 25 183
F. Warmer Germany 11 72 0.4× 242 1.8× 121 1.0× 150 2.5× 16 0.4× 42 291

Countries citing papers authored by G. Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Phillips. The network helps show where G. Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Phillips

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Phillips. G. Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murakami, Haruyuki, Katsuhiko Tsuchiya, K. Usui, et al.. (2025). Overview of first plasma operation results of the JT-60SA superconducting magnet. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 3054(1). 12032–12032.
2.
Jokinen, A., S. Davis, E. Di Pietro, et al.. (2025). Development of the Protection System for JT-60SA Superconducting Magnet Against Vacuum Degradation. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 35(5). 1–5.
3.
Murakami, Haruyuki, Katsuhiko Tsuchiya, K. Usui, et al.. (2024). Energization Result of JT-60SA Poloidal Field Coil. TEION KOGAKU (Journal of Cryogenics and Superconductivity Society of Japan). 59(5). 304–311.
4.
Ayllon-Guerola, J., A. Mancini, Daniel García-Vallejo, et al.. (2021). Thermo-mechanical assessment of the JT-60SA fast-ion loss detector. Fusion Engineering and Design. 167. 112304–112304. 4 indexed citations
5.
Cara, Philippe, S. Chel, A. Facco, et al.. (2021). Status and future developments of the Linear IFMIF Prototype Accelerator (LIPAc). Fusion Engineering and Design. 168. 112621–112621. 10 indexed citations
6.
Withers, James C., Anisha Chaudhary, G. Phillips, & Glen P. Perram. (2017). Process Control and Defects in Ti-6Al-4V Additive Manufacturing, Using Plasma Transferred Arc (PTA) Techniques. 379–385. 1 indexed citations
7.
Novello, L., Philippe Cara, E. Gaio, et al.. (2016). Analysis of Maximum Voltage Transient of JT-60SA Toroidal Field Coils in Case of Fast Discharge. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 26(2). 1–7. 10 indexed citations
8.
Castellanos, J., Guillaume Devanz, P. Hardy, et al.. (2016). Engineering Issues of the Medium Energy Beam Transport Line and SRF Linac for the LIPAc. JACOW. 2377–2379. 1 indexed citations
9.
Polli, Gian Mario, A. Cucchiaro, Paolo Pesenti, et al.. (2015). Validation of special processes for the integration activities of the JT-60SA TF coils manufactured in Italy. Fusion Engineering and Design. 98-99. 1131–1134. 6 indexed citations
10.
Decool, P., G. Jiolat, J.L. Maréchal, et al.. (2015). Starting the production of the CEA JT-60SA TF coils at Alstom. Fusion Engineering and Design. 98-99. 1044–1047. 7 indexed citations
11.
Phillips, G., P. Barabaschi, S. Davis, et al.. (2013). Manufacturing Status of JT-60SA Toroidal Field Coils. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 24(3). 1–4. 1 indexed citations
12.
Nunio, F., S. Davis, P. Decool, et al.. (2013). Qualification of the Fastening Components of the Outer Intercoil Structure of the JT-60 SA Tokamak. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 24(3). 1–5. 6 indexed citations
13.
Decool, P., et al.. (2013). JT-60SA TF Magnet Industrial Manufacturing Preparation and Qualifications. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 24(3). 1–4. 12 indexed citations
14.
Cucchiaro, A., et al.. (2013). Qualification and preparatory activities for the manufacturing of 9 TF coils of the JT-60SA magnet. Fusion Engineering and Design. 88(9-10). 1605–1608. 11 indexed citations
15.
Tomarchio, Valerio, et al.. (2011). A Global Structural and Electromagnetic Finite Element Model for the Prediction of the Mechanical Behavior of the JT-60SA Superconducting Magnet System. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 22(3). 4703304–4703304. 6 indexed citations
16.
Shibanuma, K., Takashi Arai, H. Kawashima, et al.. (2010). Basic Concept of JT-60SA Tokamak Assembly. 7 indexed citations
17.
Phillips, G., et al.. (2002). A submillimetre wave extended interaction oscillator with novel broadband mechanical tuning. 897–900. 3 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Matthew J. & G. Phillips. (1994). Power Klystrons Today. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 20 indexed citations
19.
Buchanan, J., E. V. Hungerford, G. S. Mutchler, et al.. (1972). A multi-wire proportional counter system for use in low, medium and high energy physics. Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 99(1). 159–172. 17 indexed citations
20.
Phillips, G., et al.. (1956). A NEW METHOD OF MEASURING THE EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD*. Geophysical Prospecting. 4(1). 1–9. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026