G. Phillip Schoettle
- Surgery top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Tommy L. FudgeDeepak M. GangaharSamuel L. SelingerWilliam W. AngellKeith B. AllenWilliam W. O’NeillRobert D. DowlingMichael R. Petracek
- Topics
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (4 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers)Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
G. Phillip Schoettle
10 papers receiving 474 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Surgery 343
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 202
- Biomedical Engineering 175
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 149
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 111
Countries citing papers authored by G. Phillip Schoettle
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Phillip Schoettle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Phillip Schoettle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Phillip Schoettle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Phillip Schoettle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Phillip Schoettle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Phillip Schoettle. The network helps show where G. Phillip Schoettle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Phillip Schoettle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Phillip Schoettle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Phillip Schoettle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Phillip Schoettle. G. Phillip Schoettle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 254 | |
| 6 | 163 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | Mediastinal drainage and positive end expiratory pressure after cardio pulmonary bypass | 1 |
| 10 | 8 |
About G. Phillip Schoettle
G. Phillip Schoettle is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (149 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (202 citations) and Surgery (343 citations). G. Phillip Schoettle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tommy L. Fudge, Deepak M. Gangahar, Samuel L. Selinger, William W. Angell, Keith B. Allen, William W. O’Neill, Robert D. Dowling, Michael R. Petracek, Carl J. Shaar and Joginder N. Bhayana. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.