Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Bursty bulk flows in the inner central plasma sheet
1992920 citationsW. Baumjohann, G. Paschmann et al.Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheresprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Paschmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Paschmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Paschmann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Paschmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Paschmann. The network helps show where G. Paschmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Paschmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Paschmann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Paschmann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Paschmann. G. Paschmann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Haaland, S., Hiroshi Hasegawa, G. Paschmann, B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, & M. W. Dunlop. (2021). 20 Years of Cluster Observations: The Magnetopause. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 126(8).9 indexed citations
3.
Paschmann, G., B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, S. Haaland, T. D. Phan, & R. E. Denton. (2020). Comparison of Quality Measures for Walén Relation. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 125(7).4 indexed citations
Fuselier, S. A., S. Haaland, P. Tenfjord, et al.. (2020). High-density magnetospheric He + at the dayside magnetopause and its effect on magnetic reconnection. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 2020.1 indexed citations
Sonnerup, B. U. Ö., S. Haaland, G. Paschmann, & R. E. Denton. (2018). Quality Measure for the Walén Relation. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 123(12). 9979–9990.5 indexed citations
Hasegawa, Hiroshi, B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, M. W. Dunlop, et al.. (2004). Structure of flux transfer events reconstructed from Cluster multi-spacecraft measurements: Evidence for component merging. 35. 539.1 indexed citations
13.
Fontaine, D., et al.. (2004). Electron Dynamics Associated With Ion Beam Acceleration Above the Polar Cap. AGUFM. 2004.1 indexed citations
14.
Puhl‐Quinn, P., H. Matsui, G. Paschmann, et al.. (2004). ULF Wave Activity in the Terrestrial Polar Cap and Polar Cap Boundary Regions as Observed by Cluster. AGUFM. 2004.1 indexed citations
Rijnbeek, R. P., H. K. Biernat, Martin Heyn, et al.. (1989). THE STRUCTURE OF THE RECONNECTION LAYER OBSERVED BY ISEE 1 ON 8 SEPTEMBER 1978. Annales Geophysicae. 7. 297–310.24 indexed citations
17.
Paschmann, G., S. A. Fuselier, & D. M. Klumpar. (1989). High-speed flows of H(+) and He(2+) ions at the magnetosphere. Geophysical Research Letters. 16.1 indexed citations
Krimigis, S. M., R. W. McEntire, G. Haerendel, G. Paschmann, & D. A. Bryant. (1983). The Active Magnetospheric Particle Tracer Explorers program.. Johns Hopkins APL technical digest. 4. 3–11.7 indexed citations
20.
Paschmann, G.. (1979). Plasma structure of the magnetopause and boundary layer. ESASP. 148. 25–36.23 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.