Citations per year, relative to G. Mathez G. Mathez (= 1×)
peers
J. P. Picat
Countries citing papers authored by G. Mathez
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Mathez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Mathez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Mathez more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Mathez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Mathez. The network helps show where G. Mathez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Mathez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Mathez.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Mathez based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Mathez. G. Mathez is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Waerbeke, Ludovic Van, Y. Mellier, Petra Schneider, B. Fort, & G. Mathez. (1997). THE AUTO-CORRELATION FUNCTION OF THE EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT. I. MEASURING GRAVITATIONAL SHEAR. 317(2). 303–317.1 indexed citations
4.
Kneib, Jean‐Paul, et al.. (1994). "Redshift survey" up to b_J_=27: distance of gravitational arclets behind Abell 370. 286. 701–717.1 indexed citations
5.
Lapparent, V. de, Cindy Bellanger, S. Arnouts, et al.. (1993). Mapping the large-scale structure with the ESO multi-slit spectrographs.. Msngr. 72. 34–38.
6.
Mathez, G., B. Fort, Y. Mellier, J. P. Picat, & G. Soucail. (1992). A new straight arc detected in a cluster of galaxies at z=0.423. 256(2). 343–350.2 indexed citations
7.
Mathez, G., Aggeliki Kassiola, & M. Lachièze-Rey. (1991). Analytic volumes and maximum volumes for any q(0) in standard Friedmann cosmology. 242(1). 13–16.1 indexed citations
Mazure, A., et al.. (1988). Cross identification of 238 galaxies and use of a colour magnitude relation in the Coma cluster. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 76(3). 339–346.2 indexed citations
10.
Soucail, G., et al.. (1988). Detection and photometry of a complex system in the center of the A 2218 cluster of galaxies.. A&A. 190.1 indexed citations
11.
Mellier, Y., et al.. (1988). Subclustering and evolution of the Coma cluster. 199. 67–72.9 indexed citations
12.
Soucail, G., et al.. (1988). The giant arc in A 370 : spectroscopic evidence for gravitational lensing from a source at Z=0.724.. 191(2).4 indexed citations
13.
Soucail, G., et al.. (1987). Discovery of the first gravitational Einstein ring - The luminous arc in Abell 370. The Messenger. 50. 5.2 indexed citations
14.
Soucail, G., Y. Mellier, B. Fort, F. Hammer, & G. Mathez. (1987). Further data on the blue ring-like structure in A 370.. 184.2 indexed citations
Festou, M. C., J. Lecacheux, J. L. Kohl, et al.. (1986). Photometry and activity of the nucleus of P/Halley at heliocentric distances larger than 4.6 AU, pre-perihelion. 169. 336–344.5 indexed citations
17.
Fèvre, O. Le, et al.. (1986). Electronographic BV photometry of three distant clusters of galaxies. I: Observations and reduction techniques. 154. 92–99.3 indexed citations
18.
Mathez, G. & Laurent Nottale. (1982). On the behaviour of QSO space density beyond Z = 3.5. 113(2). 336–339.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.