G. Kok

708 total citations
9 papers, 202 citations indexed

About

G. Kok is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Environmental Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Kok has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 202 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Atmospheric Science, 3 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 2 papers in Environmental Engineering. Recurrent topics in G. Kok's work include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (4 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (3 papers) and Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (3 papers). G. Kok is often cited by papers focused on Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (4 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (3 papers) and Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (3 papers). G. Kok collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. G. Kok's co-authors include A. E. Perring, Darrel Baumgardner, Mark Hernandez, Kevin McCabe, Dominick V. Spracklen, Joshua P. Schwarz, D. W. Fahey, G. R. McMeeking, Colette L. Heald and James B. McQuaid and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of Aerosol Science and Atmospheric measurement techniques.

In The Last Decade

G. Kok

9 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
G. Kok United States	4	159	108	68	43	25	9	202
Tobias Könemann Germany	5	128 0.8×	95 0.9×	66 1.0×	42 1.0×	19 0.8×	7	186
E. Toprak Germany	5	144 0.9×	170 1.6×	53 0.8×	99 2.3×	11 0.4×	7	254
Dagen D. Hughes United States	8	193 1.2×	250 2.3×	60 0.9×	76 1.8×	40 1.6×	11	319
Abdoulaye Samaké France	5	220 1.4×	168 1.6×	95 1.4×	73 1.7×	3 0.1×	5	286
Laëtitia Bouvier France	6	71 0.4×	65 0.6×	25 0.4×	22 0.5×	5 0.2×	9	123
G. Pérez-Landa Spain	7	75 0.5×	224 2.1×	70 1.0×	193 4.5×	16 0.6×	9	270
Suzie Molloy Australia	8	146 0.9×	125 1.2×	49 0.7×	99 2.3×	1 0.0×	11	277
Chiharu Nishita‐Hara Japan	9	155 1.0×	229 2.1×	51 0.8×	171 4.0×	3 0.1×	18	294
Alexander Kurganskiy United Kingdom	4	47 0.3×	53 0.5×	24 0.4×	36 0.8×	25 1.0×	6	99
Veijo Hiltunen Finland	3	145 0.9×	124 1.1×	61 0.9×	40 0.9×	5 0.2×	6	178

Countries citing papers authored by G. Kok

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Kok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Kok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Kok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Kok

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Kok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Kok. The network helps show where G. Kok may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Kok

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Kok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Kok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Kok. G. Kok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Dijk, Marco van & G. Kok. (2023). D2.2 - Advanced Error Modelling of a Fourier Scatterometer. Lectures. 207–208. 1 indexed citations

2.

Hernandez, Mark, et al.. (2016). Chamber catalogues of optical and fluorescent signatures distinguishbioaerosol classes. Atmospheric measurement techniques. 9(7). 3283–3292. 88 indexed citations

3.

Sarda‐Estève, Roland, M. W. Gallagher, J. A. Huffman, et al.. (2014). International Inter-comparison of Laser/Light-induced Fluorescence (L/LIF) Methods for the Real-time Detection of Bioaerosols: BIODETECT 2014 Campaign at CEA/LSCE ACTRIS SUPERSITE (Saclay, France). HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 1 indexed citations

4.

Perring, A. E., Joshua P. Schwarz, Darrel Baumgardner, et al.. (2014). Airborne observations of regional variation in fluorescent aerosol across the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 120(3). 1153–1170. 100 indexed citations

5.

Ghan, S. J., J. M. Hubbe, Connor Flynn, et al.. (2008). Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC). 2 indexed citations

6.

Baumgardner, D., et al.. (2006). The small particle dilemma: Fracture or Fiction?. JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich). 2006. 1 indexed citations

7.

Kok, G., D. Baumgardner, & Scott M. Spuler. (2002). A Single Particle Soot Photometer for the Measurement of Aerosol Black Carbon. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2002. 1 indexed citations

8.

Hering, Alessandro, Andrê S. H. Prévôt, J. Staehelin, A. Waldvogel, & G. Kok. (1995). Aerosol aircraft measurements during photosmog episodes over the Swiss plateau and the Southern Pre-Alpine Region. Journal of Aerosol Science. 26. S67–S68. 3 indexed citations

9.

Kok, G., et al.. (1986). Aspects of the water economy of Steenbok (Raphicerus campestris) in the Namib Desert. 1986. 375–387. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact