G. Keller

1.9k total citations
28 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

G. Keller is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Polymers and Plastics. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Keller has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 10 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 8 papers in Polymers and Plastics. Recurrent topics in G. Keller's work include Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (10 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (8 papers) and Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials (8 papers). G. Keller is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (10 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (8 papers) and Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials (8 papers). G. Keller collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Russia and United States. G. Keller's co-authors include D. Vollhardt, В. И. Анисимов, Karsten Held, Volker Eyert, I. A. Nekrasov, Th. Pruschke, D. E. Kondakov, Anton Kozhevnikov, Xinguo Ren and S. Suga and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

G. Keller

28 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Keller Germany 13 994 819 551 297 284 28 1.5k
D. Di Castro Italy 28 1.6k 1.6× 1.3k 1.6× 803 1.5× 348 1.2× 237 0.8× 93 2.3k
D. I. Khomskii Russia 25 2.1k 2.1× 2.3k 2.8× 1.0k 1.8× 182 0.6× 360 1.3× 62 2.9k
Jan M. Tomczak Austria 27 1.2k 1.2× 1.1k 1.4× 676 1.2× 215 0.7× 469 1.7× 57 1.8k
R. Buder France 13 449 0.5× 517 0.6× 429 0.8× 140 0.5× 191 0.7× 46 924
I. Leonov Russia 25 1.4k 1.4× 1.3k 1.6× 751 1.4× 122 0.4× 367 1.3× 59 2.0k
I. A. Nekrasov Russia 27 2.1k 2.1× 1.9k 2.3× 670 1.2× 115 0.4× 573 2.0× 99 2.7k
S. V. Streltsov Russia 29 1.8k 1.8× 2.0k 2.4× 957 1.7× 326 1.1× 284 1.0× 152 2.8k
A. A. Schafgans United States 15 415 0.4× 458 0.6× 233 0.4× 269 0.9× 237 0.8× 27 919
P. Hansmann Germany 26 1.2k 1.3× 1.1k 1.4× 719 1.3× 116 0.4× 378 1.3× 54 1.8k
N. N. Kovaleva Russia 20 689 0.7× 770 0.9× 497 0.9× 51 0.2× 227 0.8× 52 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by G. Keller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Keller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Keller. The network helps show where G. Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Keller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Keller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Keller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Keller. G. Keller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Orlando, M. T. D., et al.. (2009). Description of the transport critical current density behavior of polycrystalline superconductors as a function of the applied magnetic field. Physica B Condensed Matter. 404(19). 3123–3126. 6 indexed citations
2.
Gertsch, B., et al.. (2008). The K-T Transition in Meghalaya, NE India. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008. 1 indexed citations
3.
Nekrasov, I. A., Karsten Held, G. Keller, et al.. (2006). Momentum-resolved spectral functions ofSrVO3calculated byLDA+DMFT. Physical Review B. 73(15). 102 indexed citations
4.
Held, Karsten, I. A. Nekrasov, G. Keller, et al.. (2006). Realistic investigations of correlated electron systems with LDA + DMFT. physica status solidi (b). 243(11). 2599–2631. 151 indexed citations
5.
Ren, Xinguo, I. Leonov, G. Keller, et al.. (2006). LDA+DMFTcomputation of the electronic spectrum of NiO. Physical Review B. 74(19). 99 indexed citations
6.
Held, Karsten, J. W. Allen, В. И. Анисимов, et al.. (2005). Two aspects of the Mott–Hubbard transition in Cr-doped. Physica B Condensed Matter. 359-361. 642–644. 4 indexed citations
7.
Анисимов, В. И., D. E. Kondakov, Anton Kozhevnikov, et al.. (2005). Full orbital calculation scheme for materials with strongly correlated electrons. Physical Review B. 71(12). 243 indexed citations
8.
Sekiyama, A., H. Fujiwara, S. Imada, et al.. (2004). Mutual Experimental and Theoretical Validation of Bulk Photoemission Spectra ofSr1−xCaxVO3. Physical Review Letters. 93(15). 156402–156402. 163 indexed citations
9.
Mo, Sung‐Kwan, Jonathan D. Denlinger, H.-D. Kim, et al.. (2003). Prominent Quasiparticle Peak in the Photoemission Spectrum of the Metallic Phase ofV2O3. Physical Review Letters. 90(18). 186403–186403. 125 indexed citations
10.
Nekrasov, I. A., Z. V. Pchelkina, G. Keller, et al.. (2003). Orbital state and magnetic properties ofLiV2O4. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 67(8). 40 indexed citations
11.
Held, Karsten, G. Keller, Volker Eyert, D. Vollhardt, & В. И. Анисимов. (2001). Mott-Hubbard Metal-Insulator Transition in ParamagneticV2O3: AnLDA+DMFT(QMC)Study. Physical Review Letters. 86(23). 5345–5348. 208 indexed citations
12.
Keller, G., S. Mändl, Ulrich Rüde, & B. Rauschenbach. (2001). Ion mass and scaling effects in PIII simulation. Surface and Coatings Technology. 136(1-3). 117–121. 9 indexed citations
13.
Huber, Peter, G. Keller, Jürgen W. Gerlach, et al.. (2000). Trench homogeneity in plasma immersion ion implantation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 161-163. 1085–1089. 10 indexed citations
14.
Held, Karsten, G. Keller, Volker Eyert, D. Vollhardt, & В. И. Анисимов. (2000). Mott-Hubbard Metal-Insulator Transition in Paramagnetic V_2O_3: a LDA+DMFT(QMC) Study. arXiv (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations
15.
Keller, G., et al.. (2000). Simulation of trench homogeneity in plasma immersion ion implantation. Journal of Applied Physics. 88(2). 1111–1117. 22 indexed citations
16.
Oberhänsli, Hedi, et al.. (1999). Diagenetically and environmentally controlled changes across the K/T transition at Koshak, Mangyshlak (Kazakstan). Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut). 2 indexed citations
17.
Keller, G., et al.. (1992). Statistics for Management and Economics: A Systematic Approach.. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician). 41(1). 128–128. 23 indexed citations
18.
Collin, G., Marie-France Gardette, G. Keller, & R. Comès. (1985). The α transition in Fe1−xMxS materials (M = Mn, Cr): Physical and structural aspects. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 46(7). 809–821. 6 indexed citations
19.
Keller, G. & J.M. Dixon. (1976). Crystalline electric fields in dilute alloys: Y-Er. Journal of Physics F Metal Physics. 6(5). 819–828. 5 indexed citations
20.
Schmidt, H., Wilfried Schäfer, G. Keller, & B. Elschner. (1972). Observation of dynamical effects in paramagnetic resonance of Eu2+ in Yb - metal. Physics Letters A. 38(3). 201–202. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. Di Castro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. I. Khomskii Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jan M. Tomczak Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Buder Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by I. Leonov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by I. A. Nekrasov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. V. Streltsov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. A. Schafgans Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. Hansmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. N. Kovaleva
Rankless by CCL
2026