G. Kauffmann

2.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

G. Kauffmann is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Kauffmann has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Instrumentation and 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in G. Kauffmann's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (7 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (3 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers). G. Kauffmann is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (7 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (3 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers). G. Kauffmann collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. G. Kauffmann's co-authors include Michael R. Blanton, István Csabai, S. D. M. White, W. Voges, J. Brinkmann, H. J. Mo, Shiyin Shen, Gerard Lemson, S. D. M. White and E. Ellingson and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

G. Kauffmann

7 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The size distribution of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

2003 705 citations Shiyin Shen, H. J. Mo et al. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society profile →

Peers

G. Kauffmann

AA

INSTR

NHEP

ECOLO

GPC

A. Oemler United States

Augustus Oemler United States

G. De Lucia Germany

M. Kleinheinrich Germany

Meghan E. Gray United Kingdom

A. K. Romer United States

S. D. M. White Germany

Mehmet Alpaslan United States

Guangtun Zhu United States

Kyle R. Stewart United States

A. Oemler United States

G. Kauffmann

1.9k ×1.4

AA

1.2k ×1.3

INSTR

164 ×1.3

NHEP

101 ×0.8

ECOLO

57 ×0.7

GPC

Citations per year, relative to G. Kauffmann G. Kauffmann (= 1×) peers A. Oemler

Countries citing papers authored by G. Kauffmann

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Kauffmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Kauffmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Kauffmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Kauffmann

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Kauffmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Kauffmann. The network helps show where G. Kauffmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Kauffmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Kauffmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Kauffmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Kauffmann. G. Kauffmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Kauffmann, G., et al.. (2012). ALFALFA H I data stacking - III. Comparison of environmental trends in H I gas mass fraction and specific star formation rate. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 427(4). 2841–2851. 53 indexed citations

2.

Li, C., Yipeng Jing, G. Kauffmann, et al.. (2006). The dependence of the pairwise velocity dispersion on galaxy properties. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 368(1). 37–47. 27 indexed citations

3.

Shen, Shiyin, H. J. Mo, S. D. M. White, et al.. (2003). The size distribution of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 343(3). 978–994. 705 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Diaferio, Antonaldo, G. Kauffmann, M. Balogh, et al.. (2001). The spatial and kinematic distributions of cluster galaxies in a CDM universe: comparison with observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 323(4). 999–1015. 113 indexed citations

5.

Lemson, Gerard & G. Kauffmann. (1999). Environmental influences on dark matter haloes and consequences for the galaxies within them. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 302(1). 111–117. 154 indexed citations

6.

Kauffmann, G., et al.. (1996). Detection of strong evolution in the population of early-type galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 283(4). L117–L122. 75 indexed citations

7.

Kauffmann, G.. (1996). The age of elliptical galaxies and bulges in a merger model. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 281(2). 487–492. 227 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact