G. Joseph Creed
- Ecology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Microbiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Richard M. CarltonNathaniel JensenCarl R. MerrilSankar AdhyaSteven J. ZulloBiswajit BiswasDavid M. JacobowitzWilliam E. Heydorn
- Topics
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (11 papers)Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers)S100 Proteins and Annexins (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaCameroon
In The Last Decade
G. Joseph Creed
28 papers receiving 899 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Ecology 345
- Molecular Biology 338
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 192
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 156
- Microbiology 136
Countries citing papers authored by G. Joseph Creed
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Joseph Creed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Joseph Creed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Joseph Creed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Joseph Creed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Joseph Creed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Joseph Creed. The network helps show where G. Joseph Creed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Joseph Creed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Joseph Creed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Joseph Creed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Joseph Creed. G. Joseph Creed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 379 | |
| 2 | Identification and use of constitutive proteins for the normalization of high resolution electrophoretograms. | 4 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | 62 | |
| 20 | 192 |
About G. Joseph Creed
G. Joseph Creed is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 941 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and S100 Proteins and Annexins (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (192 citations), Microbiology (136 citations) and Ecology (345 citations). G. Joseph Creed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. Carlton, Nathaniel Jensen, Carl R. Merril, Sankar Adhya, Steven J. Zullo, Biswajit Biswas, David M. Jacobowitz, William E. Heydorn, D.M. Jacobowitz and David C. Klein. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.