1.1k total citations 76 papers, 707 citations indexed
About
G. Hemaprabha is a scholar working on Plant Science, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering.
According to data from OpenAlex, G. Hemaprabha has authored 76 papers receiving a total of 707 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 73 papers in Plant Science, 42 papers in Surgery and 21 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in G. Hemaprabha's work include Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (72 papers), Natural Products and Biological Research (42 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (21 papers). G. Hemaprabha is often cited by papers focused on Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (72 papers), Natural Products and Biological Research (42 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (21 papers). G. Hemaprabha collaborates with scholars based in India, Australia and United States. G. Hemaprabha's co-authors include Bakshi Ram, C. Appunu, R. Nagarajan, S. Vasantha, Nagendra Kumar Singh, Ravinder Kumar, Tilak Raj Sharma, S. Venkataramana, Vivek Dalal and Kishor Gaikwad and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Frontiers in Plant Science.
In The Last Decade
G. Hemaprabha
71 papers
receiving
676 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Hemaprabha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Hemaprabha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Hemaprabha more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Hemaprabha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Hemaprabha. The network helps show where G. Hemaprabha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Hemaprabha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Hemaprabha.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Hemaprabha based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Hemaprabha. G. Hemaprabha is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hemaprabha, G., et al.. (2020). AN OVERVIEW ON THE SELECTION STRATEGIES IN SUGARCANE BREEDING PROGRAMMES. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.6 indexed citations
5.
Appunu, C., et al.. (2017). Co 06022 - a sugarcane early maturing and drought tolerant variety suitable for Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry.. 7(2). 83–92.1 indexed citations
6.
Hemaprabha, G., et al.. (2015). G × E interaction studies in multi-location trials of sugarcane using GGE biplot and ANOM analysis.. 5(1). 12–23.2 indexed citations
7.
Premachandran, M. N., et al.. (2015). Saccharum and Erianthus specific markers based on drought and sucrose specific candidate genes for hybrid identification.. 5(1). 24–32.1 indexed citations
Gomathi, R., et al.. (2011). Evaluation of elite sugarcane clones for drought tolerance.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 55–62.11 indexed citations
11.
Hemaprabha, G., et al.. (2010). DNA fingerprinting for identification and protection of elite sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) varieties. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1(4). 420–425.2 indexed citations
12.
Hemaprabha, G., et al.. (2010). Genetic diversity within sucrose rich parental pool of sugarcane and its application in sugarcane breeding through hybridization and selection.. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 70(2). 172–181.3 indexed citations
13.
Hemaprabha, G., et al.. (2010). Analysis of genetic diversity among high sucrose genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) derived from CoC 671 using sugarcane specific microsatellite markers.. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1(4). 399–406.7 indexed citations
14.
Hemaprabha, G., et al.. (2010). Identification of two new drought specific candidate genes in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1(4). 1164–1170.2 indexed citations
15.
Hemaprabha, G., et al.. (2010). Combining ability for yield and quality in sugarcane.. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1(4). 742–746.7 indexed citations
16.
Hemaprabha, G., et al.. (2006). STMS markers for fingerprinting of varieties and genotypes sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 66(2). 95–99.3 indexed citations
17.
Ram, Bakshi & G. Hemaprabha. (2005). Genetic divergence of sugar yield and its components in flowering type Saccharum officinarum clones. Agricultural science digest. 25(2). 118–120.6 indexed citations
18.
Hemaprabha, G., et al.. (1998). Nature and pattern of genetic divergence of sugar yield and its components in the progenies of Saccharum barberi. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 58(2). 193–199.4 indexed citations
19.
Ram, Bakshi & G. Hemaprabha. (1995). influence of noble and commercial hybrid clones on economic traits in mobilization of Saccharum species. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 55(2). 166–169.1 indexed citations
20.
Ram, Bakshi & G. Hemaprabha. (1990). Variability pattern in cultivar X species progenies in sugarcane.. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 50(4). 400–406.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.