G. HADLEY

1.5k citations
38 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

G. HADLEY

37 papers receiving 923 citations

Peers

G. HADLEY
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 581
  • Plant Science 626
  • Dermatology 123
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 124
  • Cell Biology 151
Replace Yu‐Xiao Zhang with:
Yu‐Xiao Zhang China
Yanlei Liu China
Dana Aeschliman Canada
W. D. Armstrong Australia
J. Freise Germany
Robert E. Brooks United States
Miho Tamura Japan
Richard Eccles United Kingdom
Michael Hauser Austria
Qiuhong Guo China
G. HADLEY relative to Yu‐Xiao Zhang China Yu‐Xiao Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Yu‐Xiao Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. HADLEY

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. HADLEY's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. HADLEY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. HADLEY more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. HADLEY

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. HADLEY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. HADLEY. The network helps show where G. HADLEY may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside G. HADLEY, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. HADLEY Line = papers co-authored together G. HADLEY links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1954125
2 1970107
3 197259
4 198557
5 198453
6 196752
7 197150
8 196946
9 195841
10
Geographic Differences in the Severity of Aortic and Coronary Atherosclerosis: The United States, Jamaica, W. I., South India, and Japan.
196040
11 196739
12 196134
13 196334
14 196830
15 198329
16 195828
17 197127
18 197625
19 198425
20 197020

About G. HADLEY

G. HADLEY is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (12 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (10 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (5 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (4 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (3 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (3 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (581 citations), Plant Science (626 citations), Dermatology (123 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (124 citations) and Cell Biology (151 citations). G. HADLEY has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mauritius. Frequent co-authors include B. Williamson, Ian J. Alexander, M. C. M. Pérombelon, Satyavati M. Sirsat, Hans F. Smetana, Richard P. Johnson, Sidney S. Sobin, J.P. Blakeman, Herta M. Tremer and Wallace G. Frasher. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, The Journal of Pediatrics, Nature, Journal of Experimental Botany and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact