G. E. Dodge

5.6k total citations
9 papers, 66 citations indexed

About

G. E. Dodge is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, G. E. Dodge has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 66 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in G. E. Dodge's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (3 papers). G. E. Dodge is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (3 papers). G. E. Dodge collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. G. E. Dodge's co-authors include C. Keith, W. J. Briscoe, D. Rosenzweig, G. R. Mason, M. Anghinolfi, V. D. Burkert, S. Bültmann, K.S. Chung, Maxim V. Polyakov and B. Norum and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics A and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

G. E. Dodge

8 papers receiving 65 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
G. E. Dodge United States	5	58	13	9	8	4	9	66
T. Filipova Russia	3	43 0.7×	12 0.9×	6 0.7×	10 1.3×	3 0.8×	3	50
Ф. Клейн Germany	4	93 1.6×	10 0.8×	5 0.6×	7 0.9×	5 1.3×	7	96
K. Turzó France	3	44 0.8×	20 1.5×	11 1.2×	11 1.4×	4 1.0×	5	47
V. Vikhrov Russia	4	67 1.2×	16 1.2×	11 1.2×	8 1.0×		9	74
D. Nikitin Russia	3	68 1.2×	13 1.0×	7 0.8×	8 1.0×	3 0.8×	4	71
A. P. White United Kingdom	5	50 0.9×	16 1.2×	12 1.3×	9 1.1×	2 0.5×	10	57
M. Bouwhuis United States	2	38 0.7×	18 1.4×	6 0.7×	10 1.3×	6 1.5×	3	41
L. M. Qin Switzerland	4	45 0.8×	22 1.7×	10 1.1×	12 1.5×	3 0.8×	7	46
M. K. Jones United States	6	55 0.9×	23 1.8×	13 1.4×	9 1.1×	3 0.8×	12	60
H. R. Poolman Netherlands	3	44 0.8×	29 2.2×	9 1.0×	12 1.5×	5 1.3×	6	52

Countries citing papers authored by G. E. Dodge

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. E. Dodge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. E. Dodge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. E. Dodge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. E. Dodge

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. E. Dodge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. E. Dodge. The network helps show where G. E. Dodge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. E. Dodge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. E. Dodge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. E. Dodge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. E. Dodge. G. E. Dodge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Amaryan, M. J., G. Gavalian, C. S. Nepali, et al.. (2012). Observation of a narrow structure in1H(γ,KS0)Xvia interference withφ-meson production. Physical Review C. 85(3). 13 indexed citations

2.

Keith, C., M. Anghinolfi, M. Battaglieri, et al.. (2003). A polarized target for the CLAS detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 501(2-3). 327–339. 20 indexed citations

3.

Kühn, Sebastian, G. E. Dodge, S. Stepanyan, et al.. (2003). Measurement of spin structure functions at moderate Q2 using CLAS. Nuclear Physics A. 721. C340–C343.

4.

Blok, H.P., T. Botto, G. E. Dodge, et al.. (1999). A Recoil Detector for electron scattering experiments with internal targets. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 434(2-3). 279–296. 1 indexed citations

5.

Blok, H.P., J. F. J. van den Brand, H. J. Bulten, et al.. (1998). The 4He(e, e′p) cross section at large missing energy. Nuclear Physics A. 631. 593–596. 2 indexed citations

6.

Blok, H.P., G. E. Dodge, P. Heimberg, et al.. (1998). A recoil detector for the internal target facility of AmPS (NIKHEF). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 409(1-3). 443–446. 1 indexed citations

7.

Blok, H.P., I. Bobeldijk, G. E. Dodge, et al.. (1997). Electroproduction of neutral pions on the proton. Nuclear Physics A. 612(3-4). 391–417. 10 indexed citations

8.

Cummings, W. J., G. E. Dodge, S. S. Hanna, et al.. (1992). Energetic protons and deuterons emitted followingμ−capture byHe3nuclei. Physical Review Letters. 68(3). 293–296. 11 indexed citations

9.

Champagne, A. E., et al.. (1988). Gamma decays of isobaric analog states relevant to neutrino detection. Physical Review C. 38(2). 900–904. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact