Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Serological responses of equids fed Toxoplasma gondii oocysts
Citations per year, relative to G Desmonts G Desmonts (= 1×)
peers
P. Thulliez
Countries citing papers authored by G Desmonts
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of G Desmonts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Desmonts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Desmonts more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Desmonts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Desmonts. The network helps show where G Desmonts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G Desmonts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G Desmonts.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G Desmonts based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G Desmonts. G Desmonts is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Desmonts, G & J Couvreur. (1986). Toxoplasmose congénitale. Etude prospective de l'issue de la grossesse chez 542 femmes atteintes de toxoplasmose acquise en cours de gestation. 62(20). 1418–1422.24 indexed citations
Couvreur, J, et al.. (1985). Etude d'une série homogène de 210 cas de toxoplasmose congénitale chez des nourrissons âgés de 0 à 11 mois et dépistés de façon prospective. 61(43). 3015–3019.23 indexed citations
7.
Couvreur, J, et al.. (1984). [The kidney and toxoplasmosis].. PubMed. 31(10). 847–52.1 indexed citations
8.
Couvreur, J, et al.. (1984). [A homogeneous series of 210 cases of congenital toxoplasmosis in 0 to 11-month-old infants detected prospectively].. PubMed. 31(10). 815–9.72 indexed citations
9.
Desmonts, G. (1983). Dépistage de la toxoplasmose par agglutination des parasites. Intérêt d'un antigène très sensible pour la recherche des immunoglobulines G spécifiques.. Annales de biologie clinique. 41(2).2 indexed citations
Desmonts, G, et al.. (1974). [Systematic immunologic study of toxoplasmosis in small wild mammals of France].. PubMed. 21(4). 289–300.9 indexed citations
14.
Griscelli, C, et al.. (1973). Congenital toxoplasmosis. The Journal of Pediatrics. 83(1). 20–26.18 indexed citations
Desmonts, G, et al.. (1967). The haemagglutination reaction in human toxoplasmosis.. 44(4). 391–400.3 indexed citations
17.
Desmonts, G, et al.. (1965). Epidemiological Study on Toxoplasmosis; the Influence of Cooking of Butcher's Meat on the Frequency of Human Infection.. 10(9).
18.
Desmonts, G. (1963). [THE ROLE OF THE LABORATORY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF TOXOPLASMOSIS].. PubMed. 63. 949–58.1 indexed citations
19.
Desmonts, G, et al.. (1962). [Remarks on ocular toxoplasmosis].. PubMed. 130. 287–301.1 indexed citations
20.
Lelong, M, et al.. (1953). [Generalized thrush; septicemia caused by Candida albicans].. PubMed. 54(1). 5–21.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.