G. D'Elia
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- C. PerrisLars‐Håkan ThorellBengt KjellmanLars von KnorringJörgen LehmannJan‐Otto OttossonWalter RappG. Persson
- Topics
- Treatment of Major Depression (14 papers)Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (12 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers)
In The Last Decade
G. D'Elia
46 papers receiving 814 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Psychiatry and Mental health 616
- Pharmacology 350
- Cognitive Neuroscience 197
- Clinical Psychology 179
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
Countries citing papers authored by G. D'Elia
This map shows the geographic impact of G. D'Elia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. D'Elia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. D'Elia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. D'Elia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. D'Elia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. D'Elia. The network helps show where G. D'Elia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. D'Elia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. D'Elia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. D'Elia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. D'Elia. G. D'Elia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | [Psychiatric specialists have a positive attitude to electroshock therapy. Patients and relatives have negative or ambivalent attitude]. | 1 |
| 4 | The antidepressant efficacy of high-dose nondominant long-distance parietotemporal and bitemporal electroconvulsive therapy. | 6 |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | [Cognitive therapy--a process of learning that changes dysfunctional thought patterns]. | 1 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | [Compulsory psychiatric care--converted and non-converted patient attitudes]. | 3 |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | [Practical guidelines for electroconvulsive therapy]. | 1 |
| 16 | The effect of fronto-frontal and temporo-parietal unilateral ECT on retrograde memory. | 1 |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About G. D'Elia
G. D'Elia is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 53 papers that have together received 926 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (14 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (12 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (616 citations), Biological Psychiatry (61 citations) and Pharmacology (350 citations). G. D'Elia has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and Italy. Frequent co-authors include C. Perris, Lars‐Håkan Thorell, Bengt Kjellman, Lars von Knorring, Jörgen Lehmann, Jan‐Otto Ottosson, Walter Rapp, G. Persson, Stefan Borg and Bo Siwers. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Frontiers in Oncology and Acta Neurologica Scandinavica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.