G. Decker

41 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

G. Decker
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 398
  • Radiation 136
  • Mechanics of Materials 186
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 216
  • Computational Mechanics 104
Replace Glenn A. Gerdin with:
Glenn A. Gerdin United States
W. Kies Germany
H. Bruzzone Argentina
Kuan Hiang Kwek Malaysia
Ian H. Mitchell United Kingdom
M. Milanese Argentina
Raúl Aliaga-Rossel United Kingdom
M. A. Palmer United States
John N. Olsen United States
Gene H. McCall United States
G. Decker relative to Glenn A. Gerdin United States Glenn A. Gerdin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Glenn A. Gerdin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Decker. The network helps show where G. Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Decker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Decker Line = papers co-authored together G. Decker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198652
2 199143
3 198340
4 198037
5 200035
6 199133
7 198732
8 198631
9 197629
10 199626
11 197225
12 199625
13 198223
14 197720
15 198517
16 199716
17 197213
18 198513
19 197211
20 197610

About G. Decker

G. Decker is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Radiation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (19 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (13 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (11 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (10 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (10 papers), Laser Design and Applications (7 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (5 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (398 citations), Radiation (136 citations), Mechanics of Materials (186 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (216 citations) and Computational Mechanics (104 citations). G. Decker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include W. Kies, Holger Röhr, R. Wienecke, Yu. V. Sidelnikov, J. Mark Bayley, H. Herold, Maximilian Trunk, Konstantin N. Koshelev, A. E. Robson and Sergei V. Bobashev. Their work appears in journals such as Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Physics Letters A, Journal of Applied Physics, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact