G. C. McLaughlin

3.8k total citations
107 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

G. C. McLaughlin is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, G. C. McLaughlin has authored 107 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 80 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 52 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 9 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in G. C. McLaughlin's work include Neutrino Physics Research (52 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (43 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (37 papers). G. C. McLaughlin is often cited by papers focused on Neutrino Physics Research (52 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (43 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (37 papers). G. C. McLaughlin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. G. C. McLaughlin's co-authors include Rebecca Surman, James P. Kneller, George M. Fuller, Matthew R. Mumpower, J. Engel, C. Volpe, W. R. Hix, A. B. Balantekin, Annelise Malkus and Sherwood Richers and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

G. C. McLaughlin

102 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. C. McLaughlin United States 29 2.0k 872 159 141 120 107 2.3k
Meng-Ru Wu Taiwan 25 1.5k 0.7× 1.2k 1.3× 37 0.2× 39 0.3× 103 0.9× 71 1.9k
Adam Foster United States 13 700 0.3× 937 1.1× 74 0.5× 13 0.1× 185 1.5× 46 1.2k
Jan-Willem den Herder Netherlands 13 348 0.2× 223 0.3× 73 0.5× 49 0.3× 183 1.5× 57 548
L. Baudis Switzerland 25 2.2k 1.1× 928 1.1× 205 1.3× 14 0.1× 486 4.0× 84 2.3k
H. H. Duong United States 15 867 0.4× 495 0.6× 90 0.6× 177 1.3× 131 1.1× 25 911
Aimee Hungerford United States 18 423 0.2× 840 1.0× 49 0.3× 21 0.1× 75 0.6× 48 1.0k
Y. Leifels Germany 15 771 0.4× 206 0.2× 96 0.6× 71 0.5× 131 1.1× 44 868
Francesco Vissani Italy 33 3.4k 1.7× 683 0.8× 50 0.3× 11 0.1× 66 0.6× 106 3.5k
S. Gninenko Russia 23 1.5k 0.7× 413 0.5× 68 0.4× 31 0.2× 263 2.2× 71 1.6k
D. V. Shetty United States 20 1.0k 0.5× 146 0.2× 187 1.2× 268 1.9× 222 1.9× 50 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by G. C. McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. C. McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. C. McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. C. McLaughlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. C. McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. C. McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. C. McLaughlin. The network helps show where G. C. McLaughlin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. C. McLaughlin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. C. McLaughlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. C. McLaughlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. C. McLaughlin. G. C. McLaughlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Miller, Jonah, et al.. (2025). Angle-dependent in Situ Fast Flavor Transformations in Post-neutron-star-merger Disks. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 985(1). L9–L9. 7 indexed citations
2.
Grohs, Evan, G. C. McLaughlin, Moritz Reichert, et al.. (2025). Gamma Rays as a Signature of r -process Producing Supernovae: Remnants and Future Galactic Explosions. The Astrophysical Journal. 995(1). 34–34.
3.
Kneller, James P., et al.. (2025). Quantum closures for neutrino moment transport. Physical review. D. 111(6). 7 indexed citations
4.
Kneller, James P., et al.. (2025). Quantum maximum entropy closure for small flavor coherence. Physical review. D. 111(6). 5 indexed citations
5.
McLaughlin, G. C., et al.. (2024). Magnetic Field Strength Effects on Nucleosynthesis from Neutron Star Merger Outflows. The Astrophysical Journal. 964(2). 111–111. 3 indexed citations
6.
Grohs, Evan, Sherwood Richers, Sean M. Couch, et al.. (2024). Two-moment Neutrino Flavor Transformation with Applications to the Fast Flavor Instability in Neutron Star Mergers. The Astrophysical Journal. 963(1). 11–11. 21 indexed citations
7.
Mumpower, Matthew R., T. M. Sprouse, Jonah Miller, et al.. (2024). Nuclear Uncertainties Associated with the Nucleosynthesis in Ejecta of a Black Hole Accretion Disk. The Astrophysical Journal. 970(2). 173–173. 2 indexed citations
8.
Holmbeck, Erika M., Rebecca Surman, Ian U. Roederer, G. C. McLaughlin, & Anna Frebel. (2023). HD 222925: A New Opportunity to Explore the Astrophysical and Nuclear Conditions of r-process Sites. The Astrophysical Journal. 951(1). 30–30. 2 indexed citations
9.
Engel, J., et al.. (2023). The Influence of β-decay Rates on r-process Observables. The Astrophysical Journal. 944(2). 144–144. 18 indexed citations
10.
Holmbeck, Erika M., et al.. (2023). Superheavy Elements in Kilonovae. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 951(1). L13–L13. 10 indexed citations
11.
Orford, R., Nicole Vassh, J. A. Clark, et al.. (2022). Searching for the origin of the rare-earth peak with precision mass measurements across Ce–Eu isotopic chains. Physical review. C. 105(5). 19 indexed citations
12.
Holmbeck, Erika M., Anna Frebel, G. C. McLaughlin, et al.. (2021). Reconstructing Masses of Merging Neutron Stars from Stellar r-process Abundance Signatures. The Astrophysical Journal. 909(1). 21–21. 12 indexed citations
13.
Orford, R., Nicole Vassh, J. A. Clark, et al.. (2018). Precision Mass Measurements of Neutron-Rich Neodymium and Samarium Isotopes and Their Role in Understanding Rare-Earth Peak Formation. Physical Review Letters. 120(26). 262702–262702. 51 indexed citations
14.
Caballero, Óscar, Rebecca Surman, & G. C. McLaughlin. (2015). Neutrinos and the synthesis of heavy elements: the role of gravity. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 93. 3002–3002. 3 indexed citations
15.
Kneller, James P., et al.. (2014). Stimulated neutrino transformation through turbulence. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 89(7). 8 indexed citations
16.
McLaughlin, G. C., et al.. (2013). PROSPECTS FOR USING COHERENT ELASTIC NEUTRINO-NUCLEUS SCATTERING TO MEASURE THE NUCLEAR NEUTRON FORM FACTOR. International Journal of Modern Physics E. 22(6). 1330013–1330013. 9 indexed citations
17.
Mumpower, Matthew R., G. C. McLaughlin, & Rebecca Surman. (2010). The Influence of Neutron Capture Rates on the Rare Earth Peak. 273. 2 indexed citations
18.
Kneller, James P., et al.. (2009). Dynamical Collective Calculation of Supernova Neutrino Signals. Physical Review Letters. 103(7). 71101–71101. 82 indexed citations
19.
McLaughlin, G. C., et al.. (2006). Reconstructing Supernova-Neutrino Spectra using Low-Energy Beta Beams. Physical Review Letters. 96(17). 172301–172301. 23 indexed citations
20.
Kneller, James P. & G. C. McLaughlin. (2003). BBN and Lambda_QCD. arXiv (Cornell University). 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026