G. C. Jon

494 citations
12 papers · 65 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

G. C. Jon

11 papers receiving 65 citations

Peers

G. C. Jon
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 58
  • Radiation 23
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 24
  • Spectroscopy 10
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 3
Replace M. J. López-Jiménez with:
M. J. López-Jiménez United States
R. Wolf Germany
J. Wirth Germany
K. Kimura Japan
T. S. Caldwell United States
F. De Oliveira-Santos France
R.‐D. Herzberg United Kingdom
P.W. Green Canada
B.L. Johnson United States
F. M. Marqués France
G. C. Jon relative to M. J. López-Jiménez United States M. J. López-Jiménez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. J. López-Jiménez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. C. Jon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. C. Jon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. C. Jon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. C. Jon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. C. Jon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. C. Jon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. C. Jon. The network helps show where G. C. Jon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. C. Jon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. C. Jon Line = papers co-authored together G. C. Jon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 199317
2 199714
3 20028
4 20026
5 19955
6 19993
7 19893
8 19903
9 19823
10 20022
11 19981
12
A CAMAC Based Event-by-Event Data Acquisition System for Low Energy Nuclear Studies
19930

About G. C. Jon

G. C. Jon is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 65 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (58 citations), Radiation (23 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (24 citations), Spectroscopy (10 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (3 citations). G. C. Jon has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. Ohnuma, H. Orihara, K. Ishii, Masaki Oura, T. Niizeki, T. Nakagawa, Kousei Miura, M. Hosaka, K. Itoh and T. Tōhei. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics A, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, The European Physical Journal A, Physics Letters B and Chinese Journal of Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact