G. Bodemar
Impact in
- Hepatology top 0.5%
- Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Gastroenterology top 0.5%
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Papers in
-
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders 9
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments 5
- Co-authors
- Ulrik MathiesenStergios KechagiasLennart FranzénMattias EkstedtMarika HolmqvistA. WalanLars ThoreliusB. Norlander
In The Last Decade
G. Bodemar
73 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Hepatology 1.5k
- Gastroenterology 712
- Epidemiology 2.9k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.2k
- Surgery 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by G. Bodemar
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Bodemar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Bodemar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Bodemar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Bodemar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Bodemar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Bodemar. The network helps show where G. Bodemar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Bodemar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 155 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 225 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 295 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 160 | |
| 8 | Natural history and prognostic factors in 305 Swedish patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 578 |
| 9 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 10 | Machine learning to support diagnostics in the domain of asymptomatic liver disease. | 1995 | 3 |
| 11 | 1993 | 116 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 14 | Empirical modelling versus commonly applied data analysis techniques as used for decision support in liver diseases | 1992 | 2 |
| 15 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 32 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 18 | |
| 19 | Measurements of di saccharidases originating from the duodenal bulb are they really of any value | 1983 | 1 |
| 20 | 1982 | 25 |
About G. Bodemar
G. Bodemar is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Complementary and Manual Therapy, Hepatology, Health Information Management and Epidemiology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (19 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (9 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (9 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (8 papers), Microscopic Colitis (7 papers), Mast cells and histamine (6 papers) and Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (1.5k citations), Gastroenterology (712 citations), Epidemiology (2.9k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.2k citations) and Surgery (1.4k citations). G. Bodemar has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Poland and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Ulrik Mathiesen, Stergios Kechagias, Lennart Franzén, Mattias Ekstedt, Marika Holmqvist, A. Walan, Lars Thorelius, B. Norlander, Greger Lindberg and Hanne Prytz. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, The Lancet, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of Hepatology and European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.