G. Auger

5.5k total citations
58 papers, 713 citations indexed

About

G. Auger is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Auger has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 713 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 20 papers in Radiation and 16 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in G. Auger's work include Nuclear physics research studies (40 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (10 papers). G. Auger is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (40 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (10 papers). G. Auger collaborates with scholars based in France, Italy and United States. G. Auger's co-authors include J.M. Lagrange, M. Pautrat, J. Vanhorenbeeck, H. Sergolle, Geneviève Albouy, Christiane Roulet, E. Plagnol, Éric Plagnol, W. Mittig and Olivier Jeannin and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

G. Auger

57 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Auger France 16 579 287 259 109 84 58 713
E. T. H. Clifford Canada 19 662 1.1× 214 0.7× 387 1.5× 73 0.7× 38 0.5× 53 965
D. Fabris Italy 19 722 1.2× 341 1.2× 350 1.4× 195 1.8× 17 0.2× 78 897
R.J. Slobodrian Canada 13 377 0.7× 295 1.0× 184 0.7× 41 0.4× 34 0.4× 70 563
R. A. Loveman United States 15 369 0.6× 235 0.8× 194 0.7× 34 0.3× 55 0.7× 30 574
T. Miyachi Japan 18 561 1.0× 152 0.5× 194 0.7× 44 0.4× 183 2.2× 71 849
J. A. Harvey United States 15 401 0.7× 171 0.6× 274 1.1× 122 1.1× 57 0.7× 31 542
M. Loiselet Belgium 13 383 0.7× 183 0.6× 197 0.8× 97 0.9× 41 0.5× 50 485
G. A. Petrov Russia 14 472 0.8× 682 2.4× 327 1.3× 173 1.6× 239 2.8× 40 1.1k
P. Ageron France 14 394 0.7× 722 2.5× 394 1.5× 50 0.5× 77 0.9× 20 1.0k
A. Pantaleo Italy 16 996 1.7× 359 1.3× 502 1.9× 284 2.6× 30 0.4× 73 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by G. Auger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Auger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Auger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Auger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Auger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Auger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Auger. The network helps show where G. Auger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Auger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Auger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Auger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Auger. G. Auger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Glover, Paul, Thomas Ransford, & G. Auger. (2010). A simple method for solving the Bussian equation for electrical conduction in rocks. Solid Earth. 1(1). 85–91. 6 indexed citations
2.
Łukasik, J., et al.. (2006). Directed and Elliptic Flow in 197 Au+ 197 Au at Intermediate Energies. Acta Physica Hungarica A) Heavy Ion Physics. 25(2-4). 229–239. 4 indexed citations
3.
Petiteau, Antoine, G. Auger, Hubert Halloin, et al.. (2006). LISACode: Simulating Lisa. AIP conference proceedings. 873. 633–639. 2 indexed citations
4.
Stödel, C., G. Frémont, G. Auger, & C. Spitaëls. (2006). First steps towards a target laboratory at GANIL. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 561(1). 112–114. 7 indexed citations
5.
Khouaja, A., A. C. C. Villari, Mohammed Benjelloun, et al.. (2005). Reaction cross-sections and reduced strong absorption radii of nuclei in the vicinity of closed shells N = 20 and N = 28. The European Physical Journal A. 25(S1). 223–226. 1 indexed citations
6.
Sarazin, F., H. Savajols, W. Mittig, et al.. (1998). Persistence of the. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 44–49. 2 indexed citations
7.
Casandjian, J. M., R. Lichtenthäler, W. Mittig, et al.. (1997). Atomic effects in heavy-ion elastic scattering. Physical Review C. 56(5). 2700–2706. 1 indexed citations
8.
Chartier, M., G. Auger, W. Mittig, et al.. (1996). Mass Measurement of100Sn. Physical Review Letters. 77(12). 2400–2403. 53 indexed citations
9.
Chartier, M., G. Auger, W. Mittig, et al.. (1995). Mass measurement of secondary ions of A=100 in the vicinity of 100Sn using the second cyclotron of GANIL. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 2 indexed citations
10.
Ren, Zhongzhou, et al.. (1995). Neutron halo and spin-orbit splitting in some neutron-rich nuclei. Physical Review C. 52(4). R1764–R1767. 17 indexed citations
11.
Elmaani, A., J. Alexander, N. N. Ajitanand, et al.. (1993). Breakup of intermediate-mass fragments,Be8andLi6, formed in the reactionAr40+Ag at 7.8Aand 17AMeV. Physical Review C. 48(6). 2864–2873. 3 indexed citations
12.
Casandjian, J. M., W. Mittig, R. Beunard, et al.. (1993). Absolute measurement of the GANIL beam energy. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 334(2-3). 301–304. 4 indexed citations
13.
Gilfoyle, G. P., Michael Gordon, Robert L. McGrath, et al.. (1992). Heavy residue production in 215 MeVO16+27Al reactions. Physical Review C. 46(1). 265–272. 11 indexed citations
14.
Doré, D., Luc Beaulieu, Richard Laforest, et al.. (1992). Excitation energy evolution and multi-particle correlations in heavy ion peripheral collisions at intermediate energies. Nuclear Physics A. 545(1-2). 363–368. 7 indexed citations
15.
Elmaani, A., N. N. Ajitanand, J. Alexander, et al.. (1991). Characterization of very highly excited composite nuclei: Temperature, spin zone, radial extent, and lifetime scale of1022s. Physical Review C. 43(6). R2474–R2478. 23 indexed citations
16.
Auger, G., J.M. Lagrange, M. Pautrat, & J. Vanhorenbeeck. (1984). High-spin states in 107Sn and 107In isotopes. Nuclear Physics A. 426(1). 109–124. 15 indexed citations
17.
Jacquemin, C., G. Auger, & C. Quesne. (1982). FixedJ spectral distributions in large shell model spaces. The European Physical Journal A. 309(1). 55–64. 4 indexed citations
18.
Auger, G., Geneviève Albouy, Christiane Roulet, et al.. (1980). On the Yrast levels of106?108Sn. The European Physical Journal A. 296(4). 319–322. 10 indexed citations
19.
Roulet, Christiane, Geneviève Albouy, G. Auger, et al.. (1979). Properties of 192, 190Pb: Behaviour of the very neutron-deficient even lead isotopes. Nuclear Physics A. 323(2-3). 495–520. 32 indexed citations
20.
Roulet, Christiane, Geneviève Albouy, G. Auger, et al.. (1975). A device for in-beam g-factor measurements for isomeric states in the range of a few hundred nanoseconds. Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 125(1). 29–40. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026