Friedrich Schatz
About
In The Last Decade
Friedrich Schatz
3 papers receiving 87 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Epidemiology 76
- Cell Biology 52
- Organic Chemistry 14
- Infectious Diseases 12
- Dermatology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich Schatz
This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich Schatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich Schatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich Schatz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich Schatz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich Schatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich Schatz. The network helps show where Friedrich Schatz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friedrich Schatz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friedrich Schatz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friedrich Schatz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friedrich Schatz. Friedrich Schatz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 16 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.