Friedrich Lüth

885 total citations
13 papers, 278 citations indexed

About

Friedrich Lüth is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology and Space and Planetary Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Friedrich Lüth has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 278 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Archeology, 5 papers in Paleontology and 5 papers in Space and Planetary Science. Recurrent topics in Friedrich Lüth's work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (5 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (5 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (5 papers). Friedrich Lüth is often cited by papers focused on Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (5 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (5 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (5 papers). Friedrich Lüth collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. Friedrich Lüth's co-authors include Jan Harff, Geoff Bailey, Thomas Terberger, Harald Lübke, Jesper Olsen, Jan Heinemeier, Jeffrey H. Altschul, Johannes Müller, Henny Piezonka and Joachim Bürger and has published in prestigious journals such as Geological Society London Special Publications, Journal of Archaeological Science and Radiocarbon.

In The Last Decade

Friedrich Lüth

13 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Friedrich Lüth
Garry Momber United Kingdom
Pascal Flohr United Kingdom
Michael K. Faught United States
Neill J. Wallis United States
Robert Van de Noort United Kingdom
Chester B. DePratter United States
Garry Momber United Kingdom
Friedrich Lüth
Citations per year, relative to Friedrich Lüth Friedrich Lüth (= 1×) peers Garry Momber

Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich Lüth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich Lüth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich Lüth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich Lüth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich Lüth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich Lüth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich Lüth. The network helps show where Friedrich Lüth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friedrich Lüth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friedrich Lüth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friedrich Lüth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friedrich Lüth. Friedrich Lüth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Dufraisse, Alexa, Antoine Laurent, François Lévêque, et al.. (2023). The emergence of monumental architecture in Atlantic Europe: a fortified fifth-millennium BC enclosure in western France. Antiquity. 97(391). 50–69. 1 indexed citations
2.
Altschul, Jeffrey H., et al.. (2018). Modelling Resource Values and Climate Change Impacts to Set Preservation and Research Priorities. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites. 20(4). 261–284. 23 indexed citations
3.
Lüth, Friedrich, et al.. (2018). First Trial Geophysical Surveys at Kintampo Open-Air Sites: Results, Recommendations, Research Prospects. Journal of African Archaeology. 16(1). 105–115. 2 indexed citations
4.
Terberger, Thomas, Joachim Bürger, Friedrich Lüth, Johannes Müller, & Henny Piezonka. (2018). Step by step – The neolithisation of Northern Central Europe in the light of stable isotope analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science. 99. 66–86. 21 indexed citations
5.
Darvill, Timothy & Friedrich Lüth. (2017). Avebury, Großbritannien: Landschaftsarchäologische Betrachtungen. DAI. 1. 42–45. 1 indexed citations
6.
Wright, Holly, et al.. (2017). Archaeology, Heritage, and Social Value: Public Perspectives on European Archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology. 21(1). 96–117. 35 indexed citations
7.
Harff, Jan, Geoff Bailey, & Friedrich Lüth. (2016). Geology and Archaeology: Submerged Landscapes of the Continental Shelf. 67 indexed citations
8.
Harff, Jan, Geoff Bailey, & Friedrich Lüth. (2015). Geology and archaeology: submerged landscapes of the continental shelf: an introduction. Geological Society London Special Publications. 411(1). 1–8. 27 indexed citations
10.
Darvill, Timothy, et al.. (2013). Stonehenge, Wiltshire, UK: High Resolution Geophysical Surveys in the Surrounding Landscape, 2011. European Journal of Archaeology. 16(1). 63–93. 11 indexed citations
11.
Olsen, Jesper, Jan Heinemeier, Harald Lübke, Friedrich Lüth, & Thomas Terberger. (2010). Dietary Habits and Freshwater Reservoir Effects in Bones from a Neolithic NE German Cemetery. Radiocarbon. 52(2). 635–644. 67 indexed citations
12.
Harff, Jan, Reinhard Lampe, Wolfram Lemke, et al.. (2005). The Baltic Sea—A Model Ocean to Study Interrelations of Geosphere, Ecosphere, and Anthroposphere in the Coastal Zone. Journal of Coastal Research. 2005(213). 441–441. 20 indexed citations
13.
Lüth, Friedrich, et al.. (1997). Ausgrabungen auf dem frühgeschichtlichen Seehandelsplatz von Groß Strömkendorf, Kr. Nordwestmecklenburg: Erste Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojektes.. Germania: Anzeiger der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. 75(1). 193–221. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026