Friedrich Georg Schmidt
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Polymers and Plastics top 2%
- Materials Chemistry
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Christopher Barner‐KowollikKim K. OehlenschlaegerJan MuellerNathalie K. GuimardStefan HilfJosef BrandtAlbena LedererMichelle L. Coote
- Topics
- Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (13 papers)Polymer composites and self-healing (12 papers)Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (10 papers)
In The Last Decade
Friedrich Georg Schmidt
35 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Organic Chemistry 933
- Polymers and Plastics 697
- Materials Chemistry 342
- Biomaterials 273
- Biomedical Engineering 234
Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich Georg Schmidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich Georg Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich Georg Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich Georg Schmidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich Georg Schmidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich Georg Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich Georg Schmidt. The network helps show where Friedrich Georg Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friedrich Georg Schmidt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friedrich Georg Schmidt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friedrich Georg Schmidt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friedrich Georg Schmidt. Friedrich Georg Schmidt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 249 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 62 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 98 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Friedrich Georg Schmidt
Friedrich Georg Schmidt is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Polymers and Plastics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (13 papers), Polymer composites and self-healing (12 papers) and Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (166 citations), Polymers and Plastics (697 citations) and Organic Chemistry (933 citations). Friedrich Georg Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Barner‐Kowollik, Kim K. Oehlenschlaeger, Jan Mueller, Nathalie K. Guimard, Stefan Hilf, Josef Brandt, Albena Lederer, Michelle L. Coote, Jia‐wen Zhou and Ozcan Altintas. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Materials, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Macromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.