Friederike Hoellen

937 citations
44 papers · 545 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Friederike Hoellen

43 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

Friederike Hoellen
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 149
  • Reproductive Medicine 96
  • Microbiology 36
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 91
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 87
Replace Lino Del Pup with:
Lino Del Pup Italy
Stefanos Zervoudis Greece
C.D. Christian United States
Annalisa Tancredi Italy
Eileen Shaw Canada
Tao Zhu China
Takao Hidaka Japan
Gustavo Barcelos Barra Brazil
Andrea Olmos‐Ortiz Mexico
Friederike Hoellen relative to Lino Del Pup Italy Lino Del Pup's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Lino Del Pup · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Friederike Hoellen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Friederike Hoellen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friederike Hoellen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friederike Hoellen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Friederike Hoellen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friederike Hoellen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friederike Hoellen. The network helps show where Friederike Hoellen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Friederike Hoellen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Friederike Hoellen Line = papers co-authored together Friederike Hoellen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20212
2 201913
3 201922
4 201913
5 20189
6 201710
7 20178
8 20163
9 201612
10
New Concepts in the Therapeutic Management of Myoma
20151
11 20152
12 201449
13 20132
14 201113
15
Impact of cyclooxygenase-2 in breast cancer.
201157
16 201115
17 20113
18 201039
19 20103
20 20103

About Friederike Hoellen

Friederike Hoellen is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Family Practice, having authored 44 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (10 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (9 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (8 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (7 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (149 citations), Reproductive Medicine (96 citations), Microbiology (36 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (91 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (87 citations). Friederike Hoellen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Michael K. Bohlmann, Marc Thill, Katharina Kelling, C. Dittmer, Achim Rody, Klaus Diedrich, Michael Friedrich, Georg Griesinger, Peter Hunold and Constanze Banz‐Jansen. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, PLoS ONE, Anticancer Research, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026