F.R.H. Tempelman

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

F.R.H. Tempelman is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Epidemiology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, F.R.H. Tempelman has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Rehabilitation, 5 papers in Epidemiology and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in F.R.H. Tempelman's work include Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (5 papers) and Dermatologic Treatments and Research (3 papers). F.R.H. Tempelman is often cited by papers focused on Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (5 papers) and Dermatologic Treatments and Research (3 papers). F.R.H. Tempelman collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Greece and Germany. F.R.H. Tempelman's co-authors include Paul P. M. van Zuijlen, Esther Middelkoop, Robert W. Kreis, Wim E. Tuinebreijer, A.F.P.M. Vloemans, G.I.J.M. Beerthuizen, J. Dokter, Margriet E. van Baar, M.K. Nieuwenhuis and Helma W. C. Hofland and has published in prestigious journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Journal Of Hand Surgery and Injury.

In The Last Decade

F.R.H. Tempelman

10 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: A Reliabl... 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F.R.H. Tempelman Netherlands 8 718 697 535 290 126 10 1.3k
Eric Van den Kerckhove Netherlands 17 346 0.5× 523 0.8× 447 0.8× 272 0.9× 96 0.8× 48 952
Martijn B. A. van der Wal Netherlands 18 537 0.7× 496 0.7× 624 1.2× 379 1.3× 77 0.6× 28 1.2k
Andreas Gohritz Germany 20 761 1.1× 301 0.4× 259 0.5× 248 0.9× 207 1.6× 95 1.4k
Mary Rose United States 7 292 0.4× 451 0.6× 699 1.3× 458 1.6× 73 0.6× 12 1.0k
J. Kevin Bailey United States 18 224 0.3× 277 0.4× 366 0.7× 254 0.9× 108 0.9× 43 737
Oren Lapid Netherlands 19 770 1.1× 251 0.4× 179 0.3× 159 0.5× 44 0.3× 89 1.2k
Michael Tyler United Kingdom 16 309 0.4× 104 0.1× 272 0.5× 237 0.8× 120 1.0× 37 908
Giuseppe Nisi Italy 19 565 0.8× 174 0.2× 138 0.3× 350 1.2× 39 0.3× 78 1.1k
Amir Ibrahim Lebanon 18 367 0.5× 112 0.2× 210 0.4× 335 1.2× 52 0.4× 54 923
R.B. Davey Australia 15 329 0.5× 268 0.4× 226 0.4× 112 0.4× 50 0.4× 39 729

Countries citing papers authored by F.R.H. Tempelman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.R.H. Tempelman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.R.H. Tempelman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.R.H. Tempelman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.R.H. Tempelman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.R.H. Tempelman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.R.H. Tempelman. The network helps show where F.R.H. Tempelman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F.R.H. Tempelman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F.R.H. Tempelman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F.R.H. Tempelman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F.R.H. Tempelman. F.R.H. Tempelman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Vlies, Cornelis H. van der, M.K. Nieuwenhuis, Esther Middelkoop, et al.. (2017). Indications and Predictors for Reconstructive Surgery After Hand Burns. The Journal Of Hand Surgery. 42(5). 351–358. 15 indexed citations
2.
Krijnen, Pieta, M. Elske van den Akker‐van Marle, Margriet E. van Baar, et al.. (2016). Clinical effectiveness, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of Flaminal® versus Flamazine® in the treatment of partial thickness burns: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 17(1). 122–122. 15 indexed citations
3.
Hop, M. Jenda, M.K. Nieuwenhuis, Suzanne Polinder, et al.. (2016). Return to work after specialised burn care: A two-year prospective follow-up study of the prevalence, predictors and related costs. Injury. 47(9). 1975–1982. 34 indexed citations
4.
Verhaegen, Pauline D. H. M., Monica C. T. Bloemen, Martijn B. A. van der Wal, et al.. (2014). Skin stretching for primary closure of acute burn wounds. Burns. 40(8). 1727–1737. 14 indexed citations
5.
Vloemans, A.F.P.M., et al.. (2012). Methylated spirit burns: An ongoing problem. Burns. 38(6). 872–876. 2 indexed citations
8.
Tempelman, F.R.H., et al.. (2004). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: A Reliable and Feasible Tool for Scar Evaluation. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 113(7). 1960–1965. 932 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Tempelman, F.R.H., et al.. (2004). Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?. Burns. 30(2). 103–107. 119 indexed citations
10.
Tempelman, F.R.H., et al.. (2004). Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment. Burns. 30(2). 109–114. 149 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026