Frederick W. Spiegel

42 total papers · 879 total citations
37 papers, 592 citations indexed

About

Frederick W. Spiegel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick W. Spiegel has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 592 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Molecular Biology, 26 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 18 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Frederick W. Spiegel's work include Protist diversity and phylogeny (26 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (26 papers) and Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (18 papers). Frederick W. Spiegel is often cited by papers focused on Protist diversity and phylogeny (26 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (26 papers) and Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (18 papers). Frederick W. Spiegel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Switzerland. Frederick W. Spiegel's co-authors include Matthew W. Brown, Jeffrey D. Silberman, Donna L. Moore, Lora L. Shadwick, Alexander K. Tice, Steven B. Lee, James C. Cavender, Anna Maria Fiore‐Donno, Seungho Kang and Stefan Geisen and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Mycologia and PeerJ.

In The Last Decade

Frederick W. Spiegel

37 papers receiving 563 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Frederick W. Spiegel 471 258 163 149 99 37 592
Alexander K. Tice 460 1.0× 65 0.3× 39 0.2× 256 1.7× 92 0.9× 26 575
Martin Kostka 307 0.7× 35 0.1× 35 0.2× 232 1.6× 38 0.4× 26 619
Elizabeth A. Ostrowski 284 0.6× 58 0.2× 133 0.8× 69 0.5× 61 0.6× 15 629
F. Bergmann 95 0.2× 34 0.1× 176 1.1× 121 0.8× 250 2.5× 32 631
Bob Zimmermann 423 0.9× 29 0.1× 30 0.2× 141 0.9× 50 0.5× 22 529
Sebastian Hess 358 0.8× 17 0.1× 55 0.3× 274 1.8× 107 1.1× 28 518
E. F. Haskins 289 0.6× 470 1.8× 237 1.5× 20 0.1× 290 2.9× 53 617
Janna L. Fierst 233 0.5× 23 0.1× 178 1.1× 112 0.8× 137 1.4× 29 646
Nada Žnidaršič 102 0.2× 51 0.2× 62 0.4× 157 1.1× 77 0.8× 35 578
Joseph L. Scott 146 0.3× 37 0.1× 58 0.4× 198 1.3× 32 0.3× 42 684

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Spiegel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Spiegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Spiegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Spiegel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Spiegel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Spiegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Spiegel. The network helps show where Frederick W. Spiegel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick W. Spiegel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick W. Spiegel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick W. Spiegel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick W. Spiegel. Frederick W. Spiegel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026