Frederick W. Spiegel
- Molecular Biology
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Matthew W. BrownJeffrey D. SilbermanDonna L. MooreLora L. ShadwickAlexander K. TiceSteven B. LeeJames C. CavenderKatherine Wilkinson
- Topics
- Protist diversity and phylogeny (26 papers)Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (26 papers)Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumRussia
In The Last Decade
Frederick W. Spiegel
37 papers receiving 560 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Molecular Biology 471
- Biomedical Engineering 258
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 163
- Ecology 149
- Plant Science 99
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Spiegel
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Spiegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Spiegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Spiegel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Spiegel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Spiegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Spiegel. The network helps show where Frederick W. Spiegel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick W. Spiegel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick W. Spiegel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick W. Spiegel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick W. Spiegel. Frederick W. Spiegel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 54 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 84 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | Variations in nucleolar morphology in Eumycetozoans | 4 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Frederick W. Spiegel
Frederick W. Spiegel is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Endocrinology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 37 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protist diversity and phylogeny (26 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (26 papers) and Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (91 citations), Paleontology (66 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (163 citations). Frederick W. Spiegel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Matthew W. Brown, Jeffrey D. Silberman, Donna L. Moore, Lora L. Shadwick, Alexander K. Tice, Steven B. Lee, James C. Cavender, Katherine Wilkinson, Alexander Kudryavtsev and O. Roger Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Mycologia and PeerJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.