Frederick W. James
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- Samuel KaplanTing‐Heng ChouCharles J. GlueckWilliam B. StrongStephen R. DanielsBarbara N. CampaigneMark A. SperlingDavid C. Schwartz
- Topics
- Congenital Heart Disease Studies (12 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (11 papers)Coronary Artery Anomalies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGreeceItaly
In The Last Decade
Frederick W. James
44 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 659
- Epidemiology 378
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 260
- Surgery 235
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 148
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. James
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. James more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. James
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. James. The network helps show where Frederick W. James may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick W. James
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick W. James. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick W. James based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick W. James. Frederick W. James is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 50 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 92 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Exercise testing in children and young adults: an overview. | 5 |
| 18 | 93 | |
| 19 | 77 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Frederick W. James
Frederick W. James is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (12 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (11 papers) and Coronary Artery Anomalies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (659 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (108 citations) and Epidemiology (378 citations). Frederick W. James has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Greece and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Kaplan, Ting‐Heng Chou, Charles J. Glueck, William B. Strong, Stephen R. Daniels, Barbara N. Campaigne, Mark A. Sperling, David C. Schwartz, George S. Bisset and Ronald A. Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Diabetes Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.