Frederick Travis

54 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Frederick Travis
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Clinical Psychology 847
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 732
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 307
  • Applied Psychology 116
  • Health 167
Replace Gaëlle Desbordes with:
Gaëlle Desbordes United States
Saki Santorelli United States
Rachel H. Wasserman United States
Fred Travis United States
David W. Orme‐Johnson United States
Michael J. Baime United States
Anthony P. Zanesco United States
B. Alan Wallace United States
Brandon G. King United States
Laura Schmalzl Australia
Frederick Travis relative to Gaëlle Desbordes United States Gaëlle Desbordes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Gaëlle Desbordes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Travis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Travis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Travis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Travis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Travis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Travis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Travis. The network helps show where Frederick Travis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Travis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Travis Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Travis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009132
2 1999130
3 2001117
4 2000116
5 200499
6 199798
7 198975
8 200671
9 199760
10 201757
11 200456
12 201147
13 201347
14 200044
15 199842
16 197941
17 199837
18 201634
19 201725
20 199124

About Frederick Travis

Frederick Travis is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (26 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (13 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (7 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (7 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (847 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (732 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (307 citations), Applied Psychology (116 citations) and Health (167 citations). Frederick Travis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Robert K. Wallace, Alarik Arenander, David W. Orme‐Johnson, Joseph J. Tecce, Dennis P. Heaton, Jane Schmidt‐Wilk, Harald S. Harung, Maxwell Rainforth, Yvonne Lagrosen and David A. DuBois. Their work appears in journals such as Consciousness and Cognition, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Biological Psychology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Brain and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026