Frederick M. Williams

23 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers

Frederick M. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Pollution 191
  • Rheumatology 174
  • Environmental Chemistry 120
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 52
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 69
Replace Sarah Elliott with:
Sarah Elliott United States
Chaoxu Wang China
Beatriz Fernández Spain
Yanli Zhou China
D Kuntz United States
Liang Cui China
Xiaoyan Su China
Ritin Sharma United States
Susanne Stephan Germany
Teresia Svensson Sweden
Frederick M. Williams relative to Sarah Elliott United States Sarah Elliott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Sarah Elliott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick M. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick M. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick M. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick M. Williams. The network helps show where Frederick M. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Frederick M. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick M. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Frederick M. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993166
2 1995113
3 200079
4 199939
5 199238
6 200424
7 199623
8 200023
9 199621
10 200221
11 199819
12 199717
13 200216
14 199413
15 200913
16 199513
17 199411
18 199210
19 20039
20 19957

About Frederick M. Williams

Frederick M. Williams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Environmental Chemistry, Rheumatology, Pollution and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 689 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mine drainage and remediation techniques (7 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (6 papers), Heavy metals in environment (4 papers), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (4 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (3 papers), Tailings Management and Properties (3 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (2 papers) and Biotin and Related Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (191 citations), Rheumatology (174 citations), Environmental Chemistry (120 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (52 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (69 citations). Frederick M. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Wayne F. Flintoff, Rufus L. Chaney, Lloyd R. Stark, Heather Sadlish, Charles R. Fisher, Derk C. Bergquist, Richard C. Murray, Paul J. Wuest, Roland M. Leach and Shyy-Hwa Tao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochemical Journal, Ecological Engineering, Journal of Environmental Quality and Environmental Pollution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact