Frederick J. Ernst

3.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
54 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Frederick J. Ernst is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick J. Ernst has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 27 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 21 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Frederick J. Ernst's work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers) and Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (16 papers). Frederick J. Ernst is often cited by papers focused on Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers) and Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (16 papers). Frederick J. Ernst collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Germany. Frederick J. Ernst's co-authors include Isidore Hauser, Kameshwar C. Wali, R. G. Sachs, Walter J. Wild, M. E. Ebel, Jerzy Plebański, Dongsheng Guo, Robert Warnock, C. Hoenselaers and E. Ruiz and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Reviews of Modern Physics and Annals of Physics.

In The Last Decade

Frederick J. Ernst

54 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

New Formulation of the Axially Symmetric Gravitational Fi... 1968 2026 1987 2006 1968 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick J. Ernst United States 20 1.7k 1.6k 848 233 136 54 2.5k
William Kinnersley United States 13 1.2k 0.7× 1.1k 0.7× 613 0.7× 179 0.8× 112 0.8× 20 1.7k
C. Hoenselaers Germany 17 2.6k 1.6× 2.2k 1.4× 791 0.9× 195 0.8× 249 1.8× 64 3.0k
Eduard Herlt Germany 9 2.9k 1.7× 2.4k 1.5× 781 0.9× 221 0.9× 297 2.2× 19 3.2k
Dietrich Krämer Germany 14 3.2k 1.9× 2.8k 1.7× 1.0k 1.2× 284 1.2× 345 2.5× 57 3.8k
H. van Dam United States 23 1.7k 1.0× 1.8k 1.1× 1.1k 1.2× 630 2.7× 120 0.9× 72 2.6k
Andrzej Trautman Poland 22 1.4k 0.9× 1.2k 0.8× 635 0.7× 247 1.1× 395 2.9× 65 2.1k
R. P. Kerr New Zealand 14 2.3k 1.4× 1.7k 1.0× 508 0.6× 257 1.1× 161 1.2× 25 2.6k
James M. Nester Taiwan 26 2.9k 1.8× 2.8k 1.7× 1.3k 1.6× 296 1.3× 177 1.3× 90 3.5k
Jerzy Plebański Mexico 27 2.2k 1.3× 2.0k 1.2× 1.3k 1.5× 537 2.3× 397 2.9× 98 3.2k
Dieter R. Brill United States 28 2.4k 1.4× 1.9k 1.2× 785 0.9× 481 2.1× 252 1.9× 64 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick J. Ernst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick J. Ernst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick J. Ernst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick J. Ernst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick J. Ernst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick J. Ernst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick J. Ernst. The network helps show where Frederick J. Ernst may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick J. Ernst

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick J. Ernst. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick J. Ernst based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick J. Ernst. Frederick J. Ernst is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ernst, Frederick J., V. S. Manko, & E. Ruiz. (2007). Equatorial symmetry/antisymmetry of stationary axisymmetric electrovac spacetimes: II. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 24(9). 2193–2203. 10 indexed citations
2.
Ernst, Frederick J.. (1994). Fully electrified Neugebauer spacetimes. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 50(10). 6179–6189. 7 indexed citations
3.
Ernst, Frederick J.. (1994). Determining parameters of the Neugebauer family of vacuum spacetimes in terms of data specified on the symmetry axis. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 50(8). 4993–4999. 9 indexed citations
4.
Hauser, Isidore & Frederick J. Ernst. (1993). Gürses’s type (b) transformations are neighborhood isometries. Physical Review Letters. 71(3). 316–319. 3 indexed citations
5.
Li, Wei & Frederick J. Ernst. (1989). A family of electrovac colliding wave solutions of Einstein’s equations. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 30(3). 678–682. 3 indexed citations
6.
Hauser, Isidore & Frederick J. Ernst. (1989). Initial value problem for colliding gravitational plane waves. I. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 30(4). 872–887. 20 indexed citations
7.
Ernst, Frederick J., et al.. (1987). Colliding gravitational plane waves with noncollinear polarization. I. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 28(9). 2155–2161. 21 indexed citations
8.
Ernst, Frederick J.. (1986). Derivation of Nutku-Halil colliding plane wave solution from isotropic Kasner metric using double-Harrison transformation. 141. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hauser, Isidore & Frederick J. Ernst. (1985). Proof of a generalized Geroch conjecture.. 115–125. 1 indexed citations
10.
Hauser, Isidore & Frederick J. Ernst. (1980). A homogeneous Hilbert problem for the Kinnersley–Chitre transformations. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 21(5). 1126–1140. 83 indexed citations
11.
Hauser, Isidore & Frederick J. Ernst. (1979). Integral equation method for effecting Kinnersley-Chitre transformations. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 20(2). 362–369. 58 indexed citations
12.
Hauser, Isidore & Frederick J. Ernst. (1978). On the generation of new solutions of the Einstein–Maxwell field equations from electrovac spacetimes with isometries. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 19(6). 1316–1323. 13 indexed citations
13.
Ernst, Frederick J.. (1978). Coping with different languages in the null tetrad formulation of general relativity. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 19(2). 489–493. 14 indexed citations
14.
Ernst, Frederick J.. (1976). Removal of the nodal singularity of the C-metric. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 17(4). 515–516. 100 indexed citations
15.
Ernst, Frederick J.. (1971). Exterior-Algebraic Derivation of Einstein Field Equations Employing a Generalized Basis. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 12(11). 2395–2397. 13 indexed citations
16.
Ernst, Frederick J.. (1968). New Formulation of the Axially Symmetric Gravitational Field Problem. Physical Review. 167(5). 1175–1178. 541 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Ernst, Frederick J., Robert Warnock, & Kameshwar C. Wali. (1966). Linear and Nonlinear Mass-Difference Effects in a Model of the Baryon Multiplets. Physical Review. 141(4). 1354–1372. 13 indexed citations
18.
Ernst, Frederick J., R. G. Sachs, & Kameshwar C. Wali. (1960). Electromagnetic Form Factors of the Nucleon. Physical Review. 119(3). 1105–1114. 188 indexed citations
19.
Ebel, M. E. & Frederick J. Ernst. (1960). On the role of the intermediate boson in μ → e + γ decay. Il Nuovo Cimento. 15(2). 173–180. 17 indexed citations
20.
Ernst, Frederick J.. (1960). Reactionμ+Ne+N: Intermediate Boson Theory. Physical Review Letters. 5(10). 478–480. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026