Frederick H. Sillman
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Surgery
- Oncology
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Microbiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Alexander SedlisJohn BoyceRachel G. FruchterAnthony D. NicastriDorothy L. BuchhagenKarl W. LanksAlbert StanekC Webber
- Topics
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (10 papers)Genital Health and Disease (6 papers)Urologic and reproductive health conditions (2 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyGynecologic OncologyInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frederick H. Sillman
12 papers receiving 503 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Epidemiology 381
- Surgery 234
- Oncology 101
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 87
- Microbiology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick H. Sillman
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick H. Sillman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick H. Sillman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick H. Sillman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick H. Sillman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick H. Sillman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick H. Sillman. The network helps show where Frederick H. Sillman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick H. Sillman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick H. Sillman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick H. Sillman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick H. Sillman. Frederick H. Sillman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 91 | |
| 2 | 44 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 67 | |
| 6 | 78 | |
| 7 | 92 | |
| 8 | Association of human papillomavirus infection with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. | 22 |
| 9 | 94 | |
| 10 | Invasive cancer of cervix: failures in prevention; II. Delays in diagnosis. | 4 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 13 |
About Frederick H. Sillman
Frederick H. Sillman is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Periodontics and Microbiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (10 papers), Genital Health and Disease (6 papers) and Urologic and reproductive health conditions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (87 citations), Epidemiology (381 citations) and Microbiology (63 citations). Frederick H. Sillman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Sedlis, John Boyce, Rachel G. Fruchter, Anthony D. Nicastri, Dorothy L. Buchhagen, Karl W. Lanks, Albert Stanek, C Webber, Mitchell Maiman and Dong S. Kim. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.