Frederick Doherty

525 citations
13 papers · 398 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick Doherty

13 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Frederick Doherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Reproductive Medicine 132
  • Rheumatology 206
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 79
  • Surgery 326
  • Urology 17
Replace M. Bülent Tıraş with:
M. Bülent Tıraş Türkiye
Huicheng Xu China
Charles V. Capen United States
Bruce A. Fine United States
Debora Verri Italy
Pratt Jh United States
Anne-Floor W. Pouwer Netherlands
Marcello Pellegrino Italy
Claude Reitelman United States
M. Gualtieri United States
Frederick Doherty relative to M. Bülent Tıraş Türkiye M. Bülent Tıraş's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
M. Bülent Tıraş · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Doherty. The network helps show where Frederick Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Doherty Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Doherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1987101
2 199577
3 199256
4
Ultrasound for diagnosing and preventing malplacement of intrauterine tandems.
199036
5
Ultrasound of the nonacute scrotum.
199126
6
Gallbladder visualization during post-therapy iodine-131 imaging of thyroid carcinoma.
199123
7 198622
8
Intraoperative real-time ultrasonography during intrauterine tandem placement.
198621
9 198416
10 19868
11 19827
12 19904
13 20011

About Frederick Doherty

Frederick Doherty is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Rheumatology, Surgery and Urology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Testicular diseases and treatments (4 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (3 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Genital Health and Disease (2 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (132 citations), Rheumatology (206 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (79 citations), Surgery (326 citations) and Urology (17 citations). Frederick Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Angelo A. Ucci, Grannum R. Sant, George T. Klauber, Niall McEniff, Judith Katz, C.O. Granai, Harrison Ball, Stephen L. Curry, Hywel Madoc‐Jones and Deborah Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Urology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026