Frederick C. Finzen
- Orthodontics top 2%
- Oral Surgery top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Dentistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- Donald A. CurtisPeter RechmannBeate M.T. RechmannOctavia PleshThomas A. CurtisArun SharmaStuart A. GanskyDavid N. Firtell
- Topics
- Dental materials and restorations (14 papers)Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (12 papers)Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumAustralia
In The Last Decade
Frederick C. Finzen
21 papers receiving 532 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Orthodontics 308
- Oral Surgery 283
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 192
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 142
- General Dentistry 83
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick C. Finzen
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick C. Finzen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick C. Finzen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick C. Finzen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick C. Finzen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick C. Finzen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick C. Finzen. The network helps show where Frederick C. Finzen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick C. Finzen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick C. Finzen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick C. Finzen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick C. Finzen. Frederick C. Finzen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 43 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 72 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 55 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 50 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Frederick C. Finzen
Frederick C. Finzen is a scholar working on Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and General Dentistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dental materials and restorations (14 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (12 papers) and Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (308 citations), General Dentistry (83 citations) and Oral Surgery (283 citations). Frederick C. Finzen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Donald A. Curtis, Peter Rechmann, Beate M.T. Rechmann, Octavia Plesh, Thomas A. Curtis, Arun Sharma, Stuart A. Gansky, David N. Firtell, Arun Sharma and Mark Dellinges. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine and Journal of Dental Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.