Frédéric Holzwarth

424 total citations
7 papers, 287 citations indexed

About

Frédéric Holzwarth is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Frédéric Holzwarth has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 287 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Frédéric Holzwarth's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (5 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper). Frédéric Holzwarth is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (5 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper). Frédéric Holzwarth collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and United States. Frédéric Holzwarth's co-authors include Christian Wirth, Anja Kahl, Jürgen Bauhus, Shaun R. Levick, Karin Nadrowski, Sophia Ratcliffe, Christian Wirth, Bettina Ohse, Nadja Rüger and Robinson Negrón‐Juárez and has published in prestigious journals such as Global Change Biology, Journal of Ecology and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Frédéric Holzwarth

7 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frédéric Holzwarth Germany 7 227 164 66 56 32 7 287
Endijs Bāders Latvia 9 135 0.6× 134 0.8× 100 1.5× 55 1.0× 19 0.6× 28 245
Celia Herrero de Aza Spain 12 200 0.9× 175 1.1× 67 1.0× 31 0.6× 41 1.3× 23 317
Yan-Tao Zhao China 7 256 1.1× 187 1.1× 33 0.5× 54 1.0× 31 1.0× 15 362
Benoît Courbaud France 7 270 1.2× 225 1.4× 52 0.8× 45 0.8× 23 0.7× 13 347
Andrew S. Nelson United States 12 226 1.0× 222 1.4× 66 1.0× 58 1.0× 51 1.6× 43 354
Jean-Pierre Saucier Canada 11 209 0.9× 206 1.3× 38 0.6× 90 1.6× 49 1.5× 14 349
Adrian Dănescu Germany 7 393 1.7× 283 1.7× 73 1.1× 57 1.0× 35 1.1× 8 453
Jaime Uria‐Diez Spain 8 201 0.9× 100 0.6× 38 0.6× 67 1.2× 41 1.3× 15 282
Héctor M. De los Santos-Posadas Mexico 11 272 1.2× 176 1.1× 50 0.8× 51 0.9× 97 3.0× 71 351
Joan Josep Peraire Ibáñez Spain 5 286 1.3× 244 1.5× 49 0.7× 45 0.8× 18 0.6× 12 367

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Holzwarth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Holzwarth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Holzwarth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Holzwarth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Holzwarth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Holzwarth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Holzwarth. The network helps show where Frédéric Holzwarth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frédéric Holzwarth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frédéric Holzwarth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frédéric Holzwarth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frédéric Holzwarth. Frédéric Holzwarth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Marra, Daniel Magnabosco, Susan Trumbore, Níro Higuchi, et al.. (2018). Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests. Global Change Biology. 24(12). 5867–5881. 45 indexed citations
2.
Ohse, Bettina, et al.. (2017). Different facets of tree sapling diversity influence browsing intensity by deer dependent on spatial scale. Ecology and Evolution. 7(17). 6779–6789. 26 indexed citations
3.
Marra, Daniel Magnabosco, Níro Higuchi, Susan Trumbore, et al.. (2016). Predicting biomass of hyperdiverse and structurally complex central Amazonian forests – a virtual approach using extensive field data. Biogeosciences. 13(5). 1553–1570. 23 indexed citations
4.
Holzwarth, Frédéric, Nadja Rüger, & Christian Wirth. (2015). Taking a closer look: disentangling effects of functional diversity on ecosystem functions with a trait-based model across hierarchy and time. Royal Society Open Science. 2(3). 140541–140541. 20 indexed citations
5.
Ratcliffe, Sophia, Frédéric Holzwarth, Karin Nadrowski, Shaun R. Levick, & Christian Wirth. (2014). Tree neighbourhood matters – Tree species composition drives diversity–productivity patterns in a near-natural beech forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 335. 225–234. 48 indexed citations
6.
Holzwarth, Frédéric, Anja Kahl, Jürgen Bauhus, & Christian Wirth. (2012). Many ways to die – partitioning tree mortality dynamics in a near‐natural mixed deciduous forest. Journal of Ecology. 101(1). 220–230. 109 indexed citations
7.
Holzwarth, Frédéric, et al.. (2011). Effects of beech and ash on small‐scale variation of soil acidity and nutrient stocks in a mixed deciduous forest. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 174(5). 799–808. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026