Frédéric Bouder

37 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Frédéric Bouder
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Health 87
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 225
  • Modeling and Simulation 23
  • Pharmacology 37
Replace Reinaldo Guimarães with:
Reinaldo Guimarães Brazil
Patrick Fafard Canada
Govin Permanand Denmark
Trevor Peckham United States
Robert Borst Netherlands
Lise Rochaix France
Manthan D Janodia India
Judith Singleton Australia
Daisheng Tang China
Merrill Goozner United States
Frédéric Bouder relative to Reinaldo Guimarães Brazil Reinaldo Guimarães's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Reinaldo Guimarães · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Bouder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Bouder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Bouder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Bouder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Bouder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Bouder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Bouder. The network helps show where Frédéric Bouder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Bouder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Bouder Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Bouder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202070
2 201159
3 201544
4 201638
5 201731
6 200826
7 201621
8 201921
9 201720
10 201619
11 201517
12 201211
13
Benefit/ris k communication by the European Medicines Agency: a study of influential stakeholders' expectations and attitudes
201110
14 20199
15 20159
16 20138
17 20168
18 20226
19 20215
20 20075

About Frédéric Bouder

Frédéric Bouder is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacology, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 42 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Risk Perception and Management (23 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (7 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (3 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (87 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (27 citations), Sociology and Political Science (225 citations), Modeling and Simulation (23 citations) and Pharmacology (37 citations). Frédéric Bouder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Ragnar E. Löfstedt, Terje Aven, Darrick Evensen, Jamie K. Wardman, Regine Paul, Gerhard Gaedicke, Ali Khamesipour, Patrick Obermeier, Ruth Kutalek and W Mäurer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Risk Research, Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, International Journal of Public Health, European Journal of Risk Regulation and Clinical Microbiology and Infection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact