Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
1994714 citationsFrank TipCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlandsprofile →
An Empirical Evaluation of Using Large Language Models for Automated Unit Test Generation
2023129 citationsSarah Nadi, Aryaz Eghbali et al.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineeringprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Tip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Tip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Tip more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Tip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Tip. The network helps show where Frank Tip may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank Tip
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank Tip.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank Tip based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frank Tip. Frank Tip is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nadi, Sarah, et al.. (2023). An Empirical Evaluation of Using Large Language Models for Automated Unit Test Generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 50(1). 85–105.129 indexed citations breakdown →
Tip, Frank & Peter F. Sweeney. (1997). Class hierarchy specialization. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 32(10). 271–285.10 indexed citations
16.
Tip, Frank, et al.. (1997). A slicing-based approach for locating type errors. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–24.6 indexed citations
17.
Tip, Frank. (1995). Generation of Program Analysis Tools. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands.33 indexed citations
18.
Tip, Frank. (1994). A Survey of Program Slicing Techniques.. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands. 3. 1–58.714 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Deursen, Arie van, Paul Klint, & Frank Tip. (1993). Origin tracking. Journal of Symbolic Computation. 15(5-6). 523–545.56 indexed citations
20.
Tip, Frank, et al.. (1992). Animators and error reporters for generated programming environments. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands. 1–98.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.