Frank Humle

462 total citations
10 papers, 336 citations indexed

About

Frank Humle is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Rehabilitation and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frank Humle has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 336 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Epidemiology, 5 papers in Rehabilitation and 4 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Frank Humle's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers). Frank Humle is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers). Frank Humle collaborates with scholars based in Denmark and Australia. Frank Humle's co-authors include Michael Schönberger, Thomas W. Teasdale, Lars L. Andersen, Otto Melchior Poulsen, Peter Munk Christiansen, Harald Hannerz, Ole Steen Mortensen and Jesper Mogensen and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, BMJ Open and Brain Injury.

In The Last Decade

Frank Humle

10 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frank Humle Denmark 8 210 113 69 67 59 10 336
Drew Nagele United States 5 244 1.2× 93 0.8× 149 2.2× 60 0.9× 21 0.4× 10 452
Elin Damsgård Norway 10 93 0.4× 31 0.3× 69 1.0× 52 0.8× 49 0.8× 13 327
Frikkie Maas Australia 13 63 0.3× 53 0.5× 102 1.5× 50 0.7× 55 0.9× 21 334
Keith Ganci United States 2 177 0.8× 90 0.8× 117 1.7× 32 0.5× 18 0.3× 3 363
Joshua R. Dyer United States 7 135 0.6× 43 0.4× 34 0.5× 75 1.1× 27 0.5× 8 299
Mitch Sevigny United States 11 116 0.6× 54 0.5× 45 0.7× 27 0.4× 25 0.4× 46 288
M. J. A. Edelaar Netherlands 7 234 1.1× 54 0.5× 81 1.2× 19 0.3× 76 1.3× 8 458
Ingrid Brands Netherlands 12 178 0.8× 72 0.6× 79 1.1× 121 1.8× 35 0.6× 15 327
Diane Whiting Australia 11 222 1.1× 40 0.4× 97 1.4× 215 3.2× 31 0.5× 23 441
Ellen Levin United States 6 498 2.4× 119 1.1× 165 2.4× 79 1.2× 25 0.4× 13 642

Countries citing papers authored by Frank Humle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Humle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Humle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Humle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Humle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Humle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Humle. The network helps show where Frank Humle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank Humle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank Humle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank Humle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank Humle. Frank Humle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
2.
Christiansen, Peter Munk, et al.. (2018). Specialized interdisciplinary rehabilitation reduces persistent post-concussive symptoms: a randomized clinical trial. Brain Injury. 33(3). 266–281. 60 indexed citations
3.
Hannerz, Harald, et al.. (2012). Time trend analysis of return to work after stroke in Denmark 1996–2006. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 25(2). 200–4. 15 indexed citations
4.
Hannerz, Harald, et al.. (2011). A nationwide prospective cohort study on return to gainful occupation after stroke in Denmark 1996–2006. BMJ Open. 1(2). e000180–e000180. 41 indexed citations
5.
Hannerz, Harald, et al.. (2010). Study protocol to a nationwide prospective cohort study on return to gainful occupation after stroke in Denmark 1996 - 2006. BMC Public Health. 10(1). 623–623. 5 indexed citations
6.
Schönberger, Michael, Frank Humle, & Thomas W. Teasdale. (2007). The relationship between clients’ cognitive functioning and the therapeutic working alliance in post-acute brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury. 21(8). 825–836. 20 indexed citations
7.
Schönberger, Michael, Frank Humle, & Thomas W. Teasdale. (2006). The development of the therapeutic working alliance, patients’ awareness and their compliance during the process of brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury. 20(4). 445–454. 66 indexed citations
8.
Schönberger, Michael, Frank Humle, & Thomas W. Teasdale. (2006). Subjective outcome of brain injury rehabilitation in relation to the therapeutic working alliance, client compliance and awareness. Brain Injury. 20(12). 1271–1282. 54 indexed citations
9.
Schönberger, Michael, et al.. (2006). Working alliance and patient compliance in brain injury rehabilitation and their relation to psychosocial outcome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 16(3). 298–314. 47 indexed citations
10.
Schönberger, Michael, et al.. (2006). Patient compliance in brain injury rehabilitation in relation to awareness and cognitive and physical improvement. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 16(5). 561–578. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026