Frank Gigler
- Accounting top 0.5%
- Finance top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Thomas HemmerRaghu VenugopalanChandra KanodiaHaresh SapraSunil DuttaJohn S. HughesGerald A. FelthamRobert M. Bushman
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (14 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Frank Gigler
19 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Accounting 1.6k
- Finance 708
- Strategy and Management 565
- Economics and Econometrics 230
- Management Information Systems 190
Countries citing papers authored by Frank Gigler
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Gigler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Gigler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Gigler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Gigler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Gigler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Gigler. The network helps show where Frank Gigler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank Gigler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank Gigler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank Gigler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank Gigler. Frank Gigler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Imperfect competition in audit markets and its effect on the demand for audit-related services | 13 |
| 2 | 162 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 311 | |
| 5 | 93 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 126 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | Informational Costs and Benefits of Creating Separately Identifiable Operating Segments | 0 |
| 12 | 279 | |
| 13 | 81 | |
| 14 | 213 | |
| 15 | 44 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 279 | |
| 20 | 72 |
About Frank Gigler
Frank Gigler is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (14 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (1.6k citations), Finance (708 citations) and Strategy and Management (565 citations). Frank Gigler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Hemmer, Raghu Venugopalan, Chandra Kanodia, Haresh Sapra, Sunil Dutta, John S. Hughes, Gerald A. Feltham, Robert M. Bushman, Raffi Indjejikian and Mark Penno. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Accounting and Economics, Journal of Accounting Research and The Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.