Frank G. Steindl
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Peter TeminHerbert M. KaufmanDavid ColanderRobert W. ClowerHarold BiermanChien‐Hsun ChenWilliam J. BarberFrank Brechling
- Topics
- Economic Theory and Policy (18 papers)Economic Theory and Institutions (11 papers)Economic theories and models (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frank G. Steindl
30 papers receiving 228 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 214
- Economics and Econometrics 206
- Finance 121
- Sociology and Political Science 34
- Political Science and International Relations 17
Countries citing papers authored by Frank G. Steindl
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank G. Steindl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank G. Steindl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank G. Steindl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frank G. Steindl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank G. Steindl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank G. Steindl. The network helps show where Frank G. Steindl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank G. Steindl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank G. Steindl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank G. Steindl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank G. Steindl. Frank G. Steindl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What Ended the Great Depression? It Was Not World War II | 7 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 67 |
About Frank G. Steindl
Frank G. Steindl is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Finance, having authored 40 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (18 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (11 papers) and Economic theories and models (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (214 citations), Finance (121 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (206 citations). Frank G. Steindl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Temin, Herbert M. Kaufman, David Colander, Robert W. Clower, Harold Bierman, Chien‐Hsun Chen, William J. Barber, Frank Brechling, Hans‐Werner Sinn and Daniel De La Torre Ugarte. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of Political Economy and Journal of Banking & Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.