Frank Enos
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Papers in
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 8
- Emotions and Moral Behavior 1
- Humor Studies and Applications 1
-
- Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection 5
- Authorship Attribution and Profiling 2
- Co-authors
- Julia Hirschberg (10 shared papers)Elizabeth Shriberg (7 shared papers)Martin Graciarena (6 shared papers)Štefan Beňuš (6 shared papers)Andreas Stolcke (4 shared papers)Andreas Kathol (2 shared papers)Jason Brenier (2 shared papers)Bryan Pellom (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University) (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frank Enos
10 papers receiving 381 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Social Psychology 276
- Artificial Intelligence 226
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 73
- Signal Processing 57
- Information Systems 113
Countries citing papers authored by Frank Enos
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Enos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Enos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Enos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Enos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Enos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Enos. The network helps show where Frank Enos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Frank Enos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 22 | |
| 10 | Detecting deception in speech | 2009 | 14 |
About Frank Enos
Frank Enos is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Psychology, Information Systems and Language and Linguistics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (8 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (2 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper), Misinformation and Its Impacts (1 paper) and Humor Studies and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (276 citations), Artificial Intelligence (226 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (73 citations), Signal Processing (57 citations) and Information Systems (113 citations). Frank Enos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Julia Hirschberg, Elizabeth Shriberg, Martin Graciarena, Štefan Beňuš, Andreas Stolcke, Andreas Kathol, Jason Brenier, Bryan Pellom, Cynthia Girand and Sarah L. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.