François Eliaers
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 5%
- Dermatology top 2%
- Aging top 2%
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- José RemacleOlivier ToussaintFlorence Debacq‐ChainiauxChristophe FrippiatThierry PascalMaggi BurtonQin M. ChenJean-Baptiste Mazarati
- Topics
- Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (10 papers)Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (5 papers)Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers)
- Cited by
- AgingDermatologyPhysiology
In The Last Decade
François Eliaers
16 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Molecular Biology 497
- Physiology 497
- Dermatology 187
- Aging 156
- Immunology 132
Countries citing papers authored by François Eliaers
This map shows the geographic impact of François Eliaers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by François Eliaers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites François Eliaers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by François Eliaers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by François Eliaers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by François Eliaers. The network helps show where François Eliaers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of François Eliaers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of François Eliaers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of François Eliaers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with François Eliaers. François Eliaers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 214 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 72 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 72 | |
| 6 | 74 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 87 | |
| 13 | 301 | |
| 14 | Effect of Ruscus extract and hesperidin methylchalcone on hypoxia-induced activation of endothelial cells. | 13 |
| 15 | 103 | |
| 16 | Protective effect of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761) and bilobalide against mortality and accelerated cellular aging under stressful conditions | 3 |
About François Eliaers
François Eliaers is a scholar working on Aging, Physiology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (10 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (5 papers) and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (156 citations), Dermatology (187 citations) and Physiology (497 citations). François Eliaers has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Greece and France. Frequent co-authors include José Remacle, Olivier Toussaint, Florence Debacq‐Chainiaux, Christophe Frippiat, Thierry Pascal, Maggi Burton, Qin M. Chen, Jean-Baptiste Mazarati, Jean‐François Dierick and Patrick Dumont. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cell Science, FEBS Letters and Free Radical Biology and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.