Francesco Cioci
About
In The Last Decade
Francesco Cioci
8 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Molecular Biology 409
- Plant Science 69
- Genetics 22
- Aging 13
- Cancer Research 9
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Cioci
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Cioci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Cioci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Cioci more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Cioci
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Cioci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Cioci. The network helps show where Francesco Cioci may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Cioci
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Cioci. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Cioci based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Cioci. Francesco Cioci is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 261 | |
| 4 | 70 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | In vivo Studies of the Non-transcribed Spacer Region of rDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae | 1 |
| 8 | 33 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.