Forrest Shull

9.2k total citations · 3 hit papers
143 papers, 5.8k citations indexed

About

Forrest Shull is a scholar working on Information Systems, Software and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Forrest Shull has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 5.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 102 papers in Information Systems, 49 papers in Software and 25 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Forrest Shull's work include Software Engineering Research (84 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (63 papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (40 papers). Forrest Shull is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Research (84 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (63 papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (40 papers). Forrest Shull collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Brazil. Forrest Shull's co-authors include Victor R. Basili, Filippo Lanubile, Jeffrey C. Carver, Carolyn Seaman, Nico Zazworka, Guilherme Horta Travassos, Antonio Vetrò, Marvin V. Zelkowitz, Natália Juristo and Ioana Rus and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Journal, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering and Computer.

In The Last Decade

Forrest Shull

137 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Hit Papers

Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering 1999 2026 2008 2017 2007 1999 2015 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Forrest Shull United States 39 4.8k 2.2k 1.2k 1.0k 975 143 5.8k
Magnus C. Ohlsson Sweden 12 3.8k 0.8× 1.7k 0.8× 1.5k 1.2× 717 0.7× 1.1k 1.1× 17 5.2k
Anders Wesslén Sweden 9 3.8k 0.8× 1.6k 0.8× 1.5k 1.3× 714 0.7× 1.0k 1.1× 11 5.1k
Shari Lawrence Pfleeger United States 37 5.6k 1.2× 2.3k 1.1× 1.8k 1.4× 839 0.8× 1.1k 1.2× 118 7.1k
Kent Beck United States 14 4.2k 0.9× 1.5k 0.7× 1.5k 1.2× 970 0.9× 994 1.0× 42 5.5k
Björn Regnell Sweden 30 6.1k 1.3× 2.1k 1.0× 2.5k 2.0× 1.2k 1.2× 1.3k 1.3× 99 7.8k
Natália Juristo Spain 33 3.7k 0.8× 1.2k 0.6× 1.7k 1.4× 610 0.6× 635 0.7× 146 5.2k
Tore Dybå Norway 35 5.1k 1.1× 1.0k 0.5× 941 0.8× 1.2k 1.2× 1.0k 1.0× 67 6.5k
Tracy Hall United Kingdom 33 3.9k 0.8× 2.0k 0.9× 749 0.6× 628 0.6× 777 0.8× 149 5.0k
Timothy C. Lethbridge Canada 31 2.8k 0.6× 1.1k 0.5× 1.2k 1.0× 621 0.6× 796 0.8× 150 3.5k
Alexander Serebrenik Netherlands 43 3.8k 0.8× 1.2k 0.5× 1.4k 1.1× 1.8k 1.7× 887 0.9× 236 5.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Forrest Shull

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Forrest Shull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forrest Shull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forrest Shull more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Forrest Shull

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Forrest Shull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Forrest Shull. The network helps show where Forrest Shull may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Forrest Shull

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Forrest Shull. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Forrest Shull based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Forrest Shull. Forrest Shull is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nord, Robert L., İpek Özkaya, Edward J. Schwartz, Forrest Shull, & Rick Kazman. (2016). Can Knowledge of Technical Debt Help Identify Software Vulnerabilities. USENIX Security Symposium. 4 indexed citations
2.
Post, D.E., et al.. (2015). The Computational Research and Engineering Acquisition Tools and Environments (CREATE) Program. Computing in Science & Engineering. 18(1). 10–13. 11 indexed citations
3.
Shull, Forrest. (2014). Our Best Hope. IEEE Software. 31(4). 4–8. 1 indexed citations
4.
Falessi, Davide & Forrest Shull. (2013). Towards flexible automated support to improve the quality of computational science and engineering software. Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 88–91. 1 indexed citations
5.
Shull, Forrest. (2012). Designing a World at Your Fingertips: A Look at Mobile User Interfaces. IEEE Software. 29(4). 4–7. 2 indexed citations
6.
Turhan, Burak, Lucas Layman, Madeline Diep, Hakan Erdogmus, & Forrest Shull. (2011). How Effective Is Test-Driven Development?. Biodiversity Data Journal. 11. 207–220. 26 indexed citations
7.
Shull, Forrest, et al.. (2010). An examination of change profiles in reusable and non‐reusable software systems. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution Research and Practice. 22(5). 359–380. 6 indexed citations
8.
Dingsøyr, Torgeir, Finn Olav Bjørnson, & Forrest Shull. (2009). What Do We Know about Knowledge Management? Practical Implications for Software Engineering. IEEE Software. 26(3). 100–103. 40 indexed citations
9.
Hochstein, Lorin, Forrest Shull, & Lynn B. Reid. (2008). The role of MPI in development time: a case study. IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics. 34. 6 indexed citations
10.
Seaman, Carolyn, et al.. (2008). Defect categorization. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 149–157. 60 indexed citations
11.
Denger, Christian, et al.. (2007). A Snapshot of the State of Practice in Software Development for Medical Devices. 485–487. 7 indexed citations
12.
Shull, Forrest. (2007). Who Needs Evidence, Anyway?. IEEE Software. 24(5). 10–11. 8 indexed citations
13.
Shull, Forrest, et al.. (2006). Victor R. Basili's contributions to software quality. IEEE Software. 23(1). 16–18. 8 indexed citations
14.
Shull, Forrest, Victor R. Basili, Jeffrey C. Carver, et al.. (2004). Knowledge-Sharing Issues in Experimental Software Engineering. Empirical Software Engineering. 9(1-2). 111–137. 78 indexed citations
15.
Shull, Forrest, Victor R. Basili, Jeffrey C. Carver, et al.. (2003). Replicating software engineering experiments: addressing the tacit knowledge problem. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 7–16. 90 indexed citations
16.
Basili, Victor R., Mikael Lindvall, & Forrest Shull. (2002). A light-weight process for capturing and evolving defect reduction experience. 129–132. 2 indexed citations
17.
Conradi, Reidar, et al.. (2001). A Pragmatic Documents Standard for an Experience Library: Roles,Documen, Contents and Structure. Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park). 8 indexed citations
18.
Shull, Forrest, Guilherme Horta Travassos, & Victor R. Basili. (1999). Towards Techniques for Improved OO Design Inspections. 334. 4 indexed citations
19.
Travassos, Guilherme Horta, Forrest Shull, & Jeffrey C. Carver. (1999). Evolving a Process for Inspecting OO Designs. 4 indexed citations
20.
Basili, Victor R., Gianluigi Caldiera, Filippo Lanubile, & Forrest Shull. (1996). Studies on reading techniques. 59–65. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026