Forrest D. Colburn

42 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Forrest D. Colburn
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 131
  • Political Science and International Relations 88
  • Economics and Econometrics 36
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33
  • Development 27
Replace Diana Hunt with:
Diana Hunt United Kingdom
Vali Jamal United States
Clive Y. Thomas Guyana
Ben Scully South Africa
Trevor W. Parfitt United Kingdom
John Echeverri‐Gent United States
Ernest Harsch United States
Behrooz Morvaridi United Kingdom
Jonathan Pincus United Kingdom
Reginald Herbold Green United Kingdom
Forrest D. Colburn relative to Diana Hunt United Kingdom Diana Hunt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Diana Hunt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Forrest D. Colburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Forrest D. Colburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forrest D. Colburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forrest D. Colburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Forrest D. Colburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Forrest D. Colburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Forrest D. Colburn. The network helps show where Forrest D. Colburn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Forrest D. Colburn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Forrest D. Colburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Forrest D. Colburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Forrest D. Colburn. Forrest D. Colburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 7
2 0
3 0
4 14
5
Chiquita en Colombia
0
6 7
7 1
8 8
9
The United States Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA): Negotiations and Expected Outcomes 1
3
10 0
11 10
12 10
13 8
14 35
15 1
16 2
17 15
18 1
19 8
20
Guatemala's rural health paraprofessionals
4

About Forrest D. Colburn

Forrest D. Colburn is a scholar working on Development, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 57 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (6 papers), International Development and Aid (4 papers) and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (27 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (33 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (88 citations). Forrest D. Colburn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Costa Rica and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth J. Perry, Andrea Prado, Steven Franzel, James C. Davies, Robert D. Crassweller, Alberto Trejos, Susan Eckstein, Dessalegn Rahmato, Leslie E. Anderson and Francis Fukuyama. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of Business Research and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026