Forrest A. Wright

553 total citations
9 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

Forrest A. Wright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Forrest A. Wright has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Cell Biology and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Forrest A. Wright's work include Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (3 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (2 papers) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers). Forrest A. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (3 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (2 papers) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers). Forrest A. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Canada. Forrest A. Wright's co-authors include Richard J.H. Wojcikiewicz, Gregory G. Tall, Meital Gabay, PuiYee Chan, Thomas Kaufmann, Andrew Murphy, George D. Yancopoulos, David M. Valenzuela, Danielle A. Sliter and Xiaobing Han and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Cancer Research and Science Signaling.

In The Last Decade

Forrest A. Wright

9 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Forrest A. Wright United States 9 322 113 73 29 25 9 417
Tessa Grabinski United States 11 347 1.1× 54 0.5× 66 0.9× 29 1.0× 21 0.8× 15 551
Johan Heldin Sweden 11 316 1.0× 82 0.7× 59 0.8× 24 0.8× 12 0.5× 21 458
Carl Laflamme Canada 8 219 0.7× 142 1.3× 45 0.6× 41 1.4× 16 0.6× 22 422
Christine Bareil Canada 8 412 1.3× 45 0.4× 78 1.1× 26 0.9× 40 1.6× 8 750
Huanqing Zhang China 10 257 0.8× 74 0.7× 70 1.0× 16 0.6× 8 0.3× 30 389
Daniel M. Williams United States 10 398 1.2× 82 0.7× 86 1.2× 35 1.2× 15 0.6× 14 525
Nathalie Allaman-Pillet Switzerland 10 267 0.8× 77 0.7× 26 0.4× 34 1.2× 17 0.7× 18 503
Minh Bao Huynh France 10 233 0.7× 187 1.7× 41 0.6× 13 0.4× 23 0.9× 15 441
Nezaket Türkel Türkiye 8 287 0.9× 141 1.2× 62 0.8× 52 1.8× 10 0.4× 12 419
Kristine O'Brien United States 9 582 1.8× 87 0.8× 57 0.8× 11 0.4× 17 0.7× 9 638

Countries citing papers authored by Forrest A. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Forrest A. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forrest A. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forrest A. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Forrest A. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Forrest A. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Forrest A. Wright. The network helps show where Forrest A. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Forrest A. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Forrest A. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Forrest A. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Forrest A. Wright. Forrest A. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Wright, Forrest A., et al.. (2018). The erlin2 T65I mutation inhibits erlin1/2 complex–mediated inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor ubiquitination and phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate binding. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 293(40). 15706–15714. 23 indexed citations
2.
Wang, Lili, Changying Shi, Forrest A. Wright, et al.. (2017). Multifunctional Telodendrimer Nanocarriers Restore Synergy of Bortezomib and Doxorubicin in Ovarian Cancer Treatment. Cancer Research. 77(12). 3293–3305. 39 indexed citations
3.
Wright, Forrest A., et al.. (2016). INF2‐ and FHOD‐related formins promote ovulation in the somatic gonad of C. elegans. Cytoskeleton. 73(12). 712–728. 11 indexed citations
4.
Wright, Forrest A., et al.. (2016). The Stability and Expression Level of Bok Are Governed by Binding to Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 291(22). 11820–11828. 47 indexed citations
6.
Wright, Forrest A., et al.. (2013). The Bcl-2 Protein Family Member Bok Binds to the Coupling Domain of Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors and Protects Them from Proteolytic Cleavage. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 288(35). 25340–25349. 79 indexed citations
7.
Chan, PuiYee, Meital Gabay, Forrest A. Wright, & Gregory G. Tall. (2011). Ric-8B Is a GTP-dependent G Protein αs Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286(22). 19932–19942. 53 indexed citations
8.
Gabay, Meital, Forrest A. Wright, PuiYee Chan, et al.. (2011). Ric-8 Proteins Are Molecular Chaperones That Direct Nascent G Protein α Subunit Membrane Association. Science Signaling. 4(200). ra79–ra79. 91 indexed citations
9.
Chan, PuiYee, Meital Gabay, Forrest A. Wright, et al.. (2010). Purification of Heterotrimeric G Protein α Subunits by GST-Ric-8 Association. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286(4). 2625–2635. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026