Fook Choy Yong
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Spectroscopy
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Tsoo E. KingMorio KuboyamaLaurence S. KaminskyShigeki TakemoriA. M. UnrauChin‐Sheng YuPeter M. BayleyLinda Yu
- Topics
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (12 papers)Hemoglobin structure and function (8 papers)Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Fook Choy Yong
17 papers receiving 404 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Molecular Biology 389
- Cell Biology 150
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 127
- Spectroscopy 64
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 59
Countries citing papers authored by Fook Choy Yong
This map shows the geographic impact of Fook Choy Yong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fook Choy Yong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fook Choy Yong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fook Choy Yong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fook Choy Yong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fook Choy Yong. The network helps show where Fook Choy Yong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fook Choy Yong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fook Choy Yong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fook Choy Yong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fook Choy Yong. Fook Choy Yong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 262 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 8 |
About Fook Choy Yong
Fook Choy Yong is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Electrochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (12 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (8 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (150 citations), Electrochemistry (44 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (127 citations). Fook Choy Yong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tsoo E. King, Morio Kuboyama, Laurence S. Kaminsky, Shigeki Takemori, A. M. Unrau, Chin‐Sheng Yu, Peter M. Bayley, Linda Yu, Susan B. Oldham and Michael R. Waterman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.