Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The hypocretins: Hypothalamus-specific peptides with neuroexcitatory activity
19983.0k citationsE Battenberg, Floyd E. Bloom et al.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Floyd E. Bloom
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Floyd E. Bloom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Floyd E. Bloom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Floyd E. Bloom more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Floyd E. Bloom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Floyd E. Bloom. The network helps show where Floyd E. Bloom may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Floyd E. Bloom
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Floyd E. Bloom.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Floyd E. Bloom based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Floyd E. Bloom. Floyd E. Bloom is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bloom, Floyd E., Anders Björklund, & Tomas Hökfelt. (1997). The primate nervous system. Elsevier eBooks.58 indexed citations
5.
Bloom, Floyd E.. (1997). Francis O. Schmitt (23 November 1903-3 October 1995). Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society: Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful Knowledge. 141(4). 504–508.1 indexed citations
Bloom, Floyd E.. (1994). Neuroscience : from the molecular to the cognitive. Elsevier eBooks.13 indexed citations
9.
Bloom, Floyd E., Iain L. Campbell, & Lennart Mucke. (1993). Molecular and cellular mechanisms of neural-immune interactions : a report of the 1992 FESN Study Group on "Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Neural-Immune Interactions. Elsevier eBooks.1 indexed citations
10.
Fazakerley, John K., Peter J. Southern, Floyd E. Bloom, & Michael J. Buchmeier. (1991). High resolution in situ hybridization to determine the cellular distribution of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus RNA in the tissues of persistently infected mice. Journal of General Virology.2 indexed citations
Mountcastle, Vernon B. & Floyd E. Bloom. (1986). Intrinsic regulatory systems of the brain.86 indexed citations
13.
Bloom, Floyd E. & R. Håkanson. (1983). Progress with peptides. Regulatory Peptides. 7(1). 1–1.2 indexed citations
14.
Bloom, Floyd E.. (1980). Peptides : integrators of cell and tissue function. Raven Press eBooks.25 indexed citations
15.
Schmitt, Francis O., Frederic G. Worden, George Adelman, Blair H. Smith, & Floyd E. Bloom. (1979). The neurosciences : fourth study program. MIT Press eBooks.328 indexed citations
Bloom, Floyd E.. (1967). Advances in Optical and Electron Microscopy.. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 39(4). 271–272.42 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.